Are ya'll really that simple?
No one is awarding Chris because he beat Rihanna.
They are awarding him because the voters felt he had the best album in that field.
Also, women get beat up every day in your own community and ya'll don't do a damn thing,
then jump on ATRL and trash Chris Brown because he hit Rihanna.
If it wasn't your "fave," you wouldn't care at all.
Grammys were given to all types of people, domestic abuse should not play a factor in it because the domestic abuse did not CORRELATE with the music he made
Are ya'll really that simple?
No one is awarding Chris because he beat Rihanna.
They are awarding him because the voters felt he had the best album in that field.
Also, women get beat up every day in your own community and ya'll don't do a damn thing,
then jump on ATRL and trash Chris Brown because he hit Rihanna.
If it wasn't your "fave," you wouldn't care at all.
IA, didn't want to say it outright because I don't need the points but it's true
Are ya'll really that simple?
No one is awarding Chris because he beat Rihanna.
They are awarding him because the voters felt he had the best album in that field.
Also, women get beat up every day in your own community and ya'll don't do a damn thing,
then jump on ATRL and trash Chris Brown because he hit Rihanna.
If it wasn't your "fave," you wouldn't care at all.
It's not what i'm suggesting. i don't care about his personal life i care about his music. If he makes good quality music why can't he be rewarded for his hard work?
This thread isn't about beating a woman but people are trying to make it so
It's about a personal life and should it affect the Grammys. Both are personal life issues so both are equal to each other in this thread about their effect on the Grammys
Personal life should be taken on consideration depending on the seriousness of the case. You can't award someone who's known for his violent behavior. Simply as that.
Are ya'll really that simple?
No one is awarding Chris because he beat Rihanna.
They are awarding him because the voters felt he had the best album in that field.
Also, women get beat up every day in your own community and ya'll don't do a damn thing,
then jump on ATRL and trash Chris Brown because he hit Rihanna.
If it wasn't your "fave," you wouldn't care at all.
And I think that you don't care exactly because it was Rihanna that was hit.
Personal life should be taken on consideration depending on the seriousness of the case. You can't award someone who's known for his violent behavior. Simply as that.
But they did and he performed twice while the woman he beat sat in the audience probably unbothered by it.
Neil Portnow, president of The Recording Academy: "If we're going to get in trying to personally evaluate artists in terms of their personal lives, that's a slippery slope that we wouldn't want to get into."
Emimen, Jay Z etc won Grammys nothing to do with their personal lives.
Personal life should be taken on consideration depending on the seriousness of the case. You can't award someone who's known for his violent behavior. Simply as that.
In other words, personal life should only be taken into consideration if it concerns Chris Brown. cool, got it
Personal life should be taken on consideration depending on the seriousness of the case. You can't award someone who's known for his violent behavior. Simply as that.
Again this thread isn't about him
And you aren't awarding him for his "violent behavior." You're awarding him for his music
Personal life should be taken on consideration depending on the seriousness of the case. You can't award someone who's known for his violent behavior. Simply as that.
Why not
If he's talented enough , of course you can award him. lol
Neil Portnow, president of The Recording Academy: "If we're going to get in trying to personally evaluate artists in terms of their personal lives, that's a slippery slope that we wouldn't want to get into."
Emimen, Jay Z etc won Grammys nothing to do with their personal lives.
And it should stay that way. It would cause too much controversy.
wow you can do better guys