Just going through
this article...
No thank you to Warren. Far too outspoken for a woman in the general, and lowers the discourse with her dialogue. She'd also be p old.
Kaine, eh. He's fabulous on paper but he did nothing to energize ANYONE this go around. His debate performance was also far too eccentric.
Klobuchar would be better for the Supreme Court IMO. We'll see what happens with her national profile over the next four years, but otherwise, there are far more interesting (female) candidates.
Gillibrand's history with shifting positions would hurt her a lot, whether or not there's any base for the criticism. Also probably too conservative and...bland? to energize millennials, but they don't matter all that much anyways.
Harris really intrigues me.
Duckworth I think is a longshot, but that veteran status and strikingly visual status at that ++++
Booker would be great far the debates, he'd rip Trump apart

Good name recognition too, I def think he should run.
O'Malley would be great if he could, you know, attract voters. In a field without really heavy hitters like Obama, Warren or Sanders, he would probably be able to do that.
Obama just isn't going to run.