The act of eating meat does nothing negative to our health or environment, it's the way in which we excessively consume meat and organize our livestock that does these things. I see someone else also already pointed out that everything we have now was made from nature through natural human skill!
if all those things are natural then why are they having such negative effects on our world?
Isn't the thinking that humans owe their current status in the world because our early ancestors worked out how to make fire and cook meat, which - through evolution - meant their bodies required less energy to digest raw meats that could then be reallocated to increasing our brain size? In the same way that early ancestors evolved to be more upright and better at running for hunting. We're not crouched in trees like other apes eating fruit.
So, in effect, we're only here arguing about how natural it is for humans to eat meat because we...ate meat?
because of stupid diagrams like these and people taking them seriously
as if the way our limbs function has anything to do with our diet
it's clearly not just about our limbs but also our digestive systems, like seriously is that hard to see that difference between carnivores and humans? Carnivores don't have an appendix unlike plant eaters and guess who has an appendix.
it's clearly not just about our limbs but also our digestive systems, like seriously is that hard to see that difference between carnivores and humans? Carnivores don't have an appendix unlike plant eaters and guess who has an appendix.
Not humans, or at least ours serves no biological function and is inconsequential to discussion of what we should or should not eat!
Additionally, the same research that suggests that we have eaten meat as far back as 2.5 million years ago also indicates that we have a mixed function digestive system that is not specifically plant oriented.
This has been proven wrong too many times for you to say this so matter-of-factly
No, sorry. You can say EXCESSIVE consumption of meat is detrimental to health but reasonable consumption has net positive effects on the human body. I would encourage you to try again.
No, sorry. You can say EXCESSIVE consumption of meat is detrimental to health but reasonable consumption has net positive effects on the human body. I would encourage you to try again.
we are meat eaters but it can be bad for us in excess? lol
Not humans, or at least ours serves no biological function and is inconsequential to discussion of what we should or should not eat!
Additionally, the same research that suggests that we have eaten meat as far back as 2.5 million years ago also indicates that we have a mixed function digestive system that is not specifically plant oriented.
People saying eating meat is unnatural. Bitches, sit yours pressed asses down, in my area, most elderly people pass the age of 100 with very few to no diseases at all just because they kept a balanced diet of EVERYTHING including shitloads of meat, milk, eggs and dairy throughout their lives. All these veganism and vegetarianism ideas serve one function, helping a certain industry thrive.
we are meat eaters but it can be bad for us in excess? lol
I'm sorry, but you don't seem to be all that researched on the subject if this is the argument you're going to use. Even water is toxic to humans at a certain level; there is no chemical compound that doesn't have some detrimental effect after some set amount of consumption, and there are plenty of other "natural" things that can be toxic or can increase risk for cancer when consumed in excess, so this is definitely not an argument against meat.
No, sorry. You can say EXCESSIVE consumption of meat is detrimental to health but reasonable consumption has net positive effects on the human body. I would encourage you to try again.
No. Meat consumption in general increases your risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, foodborne illness, erectile dysfunction, exposure to harmful hormones, resistance to antibiotics and most importantly -- death! Seems like a lot of negatives considering this is supposed to be 'natural' to the human physiology!
No. Meat consumption in general increases your risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, foodborne illness, erectile dysfunction, exposure to harmful hormones, resistance to antibiotics and most importantly -- death! Seems like a lot of negatives considering this is supposed to be 'natural' to the human physiology!
You are actually quite literally not correct as more recent studies show that this risk is only increased to a point that scientifically matters under conditions of excessive consumption and low-vegetable diets!
I'm sorry, but you don't seem to be all that researched on the subject if this is the argument you're going to use. Even water is toxic to humans at a certain level; there is no chemical compound that doesn't have some detrimental effect after some set amount of consumption, and there are plenty of other "natural" things that can be toxic or can increase risk for cancer when consumed in excess, so this is definitely not an argument against meat.
Anyway, I have to run and I'm on mobile, so if anyone needs links PM me as I am HAPPY to provide them later. Eat meat if you want sistren, it's natural and it's fine! xoxo Retro
I see someone else also already pointed out that everything we have now was made from nature through natural human skill!
