Quote:
Originally posted by rbautz
Do we anything know about their contracts with the labels?
Do we anything know about Tidal's supporting of alternative artists?
Do we know anything besides the price for the customers?
|
They want to sell it, it's up to them to prove that it's more than making the 1 percenters richer or feeding the artists having a label with other artists signed on it. I wasn't talking about labels as in the major labels.
The public, the press,... will always has an opinion, if necessary based on rumours or assumptions presented as the truth because there are no other reliable sources contesting it. Once the public takes a negative stance, it isn't easy to change that.
In politics badly handled PR can put off or insult the public into panick mode and cancelled or delayed construction projects for decades. Or made us Belgians literally setting concrete bridges on fire.
To use an argument of those campaigning against construction projects: We haven't seen 1 picture or textual reference to an alternative, indie, new,... artist (not 1 percenter). The rich were so busy grabbing money that they don't even have thought of packaging/disguising it. Greed can't be more blatant than this, there aren't much corporations out there this blatantly.
When they start showing that they do something for the 99% too. It will be seen as damage control. Putting lipstick on a pig won't change it's exposed true nature.
It won't change the payout rates between labels and artists.