|
The One Hit Wonders Of The Decade
Member Since: 8/9/2004
Posts: 21,889
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Afterglow
As I stated, I was talking worldwide, not just USA.
Damn bitch, your like ****ing brick wall.
|
Quote:
Originally posted by on the first post in this thread..
This is based on the US charts.
|
So you either:
1. Can't Read.
2. Dumb Bitch
3. Both
Reading some of your comments here where you stated that Samantha Mumba is not a one hit wonder makes me think of the last option. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/6/2003
Posts: 50,977
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rico Shameless v2
After the note was made that "CC" did better in the US, you switched to say you meant worldwide.
And I just checked, "With Love" peaked lower than "Come Clean" in all of the countries they were in........
|
IKR.
And btw, the best peak around the world both songs got was a #8 (CC in Holland and WL in Italy). However, CC had more LONGEVITY: 76 weeks charting against the 67 weeks of WL. Not to mention WL had the helo of digital sales.
So, Afterglow, you FAIL. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/6/2003
Posts: 50,977
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hard Candy
So you either:
1. Can't Read.
2. Dumb Bitch
3. Both
Reading some of your comments here where you stated that Samantha Mumba is not a one hit wonder makes me think of the last option. 
|
LMFAO, he said that? Now I know why he's only talking about Hilary again. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/31/2008
Posts: 11,688
|
Quote:
Originally posted by 1-N-Only21
Me & U = 3
Long Way 2 Go = 97
Sorry 
|
Yep. Maybe Official Girl will get her off the one-hit wonder list.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/4/2006
Posts: 8,136
|
So, does this mean that Hilary Duff can't even beat Miley Cyrus in the digital era? 
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Posts: 33,524
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/31/2008
Posts: 11,688
|
Quote:
Originally posted by !!!
So, does this mean that Hilary Duff can't even beat Miley Cyrus in the digital era? 
|
Basically, yes.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/9/2004
Posts: 21,889
|
Quote:
Originally posted by !!!
So, does this mean that Hilary Duff can't even beat Miley Cyrus in the digital era? 
|
Looking at their last charting singles... I think Hilary is pretty close to reach Miley's status. Only 87 spots left for Hilary. GO HILARY!

|
|
|
Member Since: 8/6/2003
Posts: 50,977
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Posts: 33,524
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/31/2008
Posts: 11,688
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hard Candy
Looking at their last charting singles... I think Hilary is pretty close to reach Miley's status. Only 87 spots left for Hilary. GO HILARY!

|
LMAO! 
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/15/2007
Posts: 6,484
|
Honestly, who cares. You guys took it the wrong way, and I see that all you people care about is saleand chart positions anyways. It won't change that "With Love" did better in the USA than 'CC' did, and that's fact. You can't change fact. 'With Love' peaked at #24, and "Come Clean" peaked at #35. So I don't know what your arguments are trying to state.
Either way, Hilary's jacked yet another thread. lol

|
|
|
Member Since: 1/27/2006
Posts: 51,546
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Afterglow
Honestly, who cares. You guys took it the wrong way, and I see that all you people care about is saleand chart positions anyways. It won't change that "With Love" did better in the USA than 'CC' did, and that's fact. You can't change fact. 'With Love' peaked at #24, and "Come Clean" peaked at #35. So I don't know what your arguments are trying to state.
Either way, Hilary's jacked yet another thread. lol

|
So we're back to the US now?  It PEAKED higher than "CC", and after it peaked for that 1 week, it went straight back down the chart.  You're a flop fan. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/15/2007
Posts: 6,484
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rico Shameless v2
So we're back to the US now?  It PEAKED higher than "CC", and after it peaked for that 1 week, it went straight back down the chart.  You're a flop fan. 
|
So what? The fact is it peaked higher. Bigger hit, who cares if it peaked there for a week? Im not a flop fan, seriously just quit it.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/27/2006
Posts: 51,546
|
A song can debut at #7 and fall off the next week, compared to a song that peaks at #15 and last 25 weeks on the chart. Which one is the hit? Stop fooling yourself into thinking she's relevant. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/16/2007
Posts: 7,191
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Afterglow
So what? The fact is it peaked higher. Bigger hit, who cares if it peaked there for a week? Im not a flop fan, seriously just quit it.
|
Your thinking all wrong, just cause it peaked higher doesnt mean it was a bigger hit..
Thats like saying Gimme More was a bigger hit than Toxic and Oops I Did It Again, it might have peaked higher but it didnt have the longevity or the big airplay, same thing with With Love and Come Clean
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/15/2007
Posts: 6,484
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rico Shameless v2
A song can debut at #7 and fall off the next week, compared to a song that peaks at #15 and last 25 weeks on the chart. Which one is the hit? Stop fooling yourself into thinking she's relevant. 
|
She's relevant. And she always will be to me. I don't care what any of you people here say, your not important. Your just 5 people on a message board, your opinions on someone, or their career means next to nothing to anyone here or anywhere else. Say what you want, it doesn't make it factual nor will anything you say have any importance. So quit the argument right now.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/22/2007
Posts: 5,601
|
Lmao at you all just repeating the same thing over and over again. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/27/2006
Posts: 51,546
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Afterglow
She's relevant. And she always will be to me. I don't care what any of you people here say, your not important. Your just 5 people on a message board, your opinions on someone, or their career means next to nothing to anyone here or anywhere else. Say what you want, it doesn't make it factual nor will anything you say have any importance. So quit the argument right now.
|
Saying "you're right" would be a much shorter version than wasting your time on us unimportant people.
And what I said was just a common sense response, not something of fact, although its true. Like CarCal22 said, "GM" peaked at #3, but was nowhere as successful as her singles that peaked lower than it.
But it's funny watching you get pissed over being wrong. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/15/2007
Posts: 6,484
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rico Shameless v2
Saying "you're right" would be a much shorter version than wasting your time on us unimportant people.
And what I said was just a common sense response, not something of fact, although its true. Like CarCal22 said, "GM" peaked at #3, but was nowhere as successful as her singles that peaked lower than it.
But it's funny watching you get pissed over being wrong. 
|
I still don't feel I'm wrong over anything. And I don't think your right, but I'm trying to stop a pathetic argument on all of our parts. The entire argument could've been killed by simply stating, let's agree to disagree, if someone is wrong let them think that. In my case, I think your wrong, in your case you think I am wrong. And no I'm no 'pissed', I'm just annoyed because of your calling me a 'flop fan'. You really have no idea what Hilary has done for me in my life and why I am such a big fan, and I didn't appreciate that at all.:-/
|
|
|
|
|