Go ahead. And when they are caught they will be warned and deleted. It's like any other section of the site that has rules.

So? The logic. Obviously I don't know ALL the inner workings of ATRL and I don't claim that I do. But sex jokes are funny. And I like em. And its my First Amendment right,



I'm a he though.

Is something like this too suggestive? It's one of my favorite pics on the internet, you never know when it might come in handy

Its suggestive

We will get back to you on that. I DON'T see a problem with it, but the majority might.

This is my fear tbh, mods. I don't have an explicit avi and I don't blog, but I don't want you to come for what makes the forum fun for others when you could just as easily come for what makes it fun for me.

I understand that racist comments and stuff should be banned, but to take away the explicit blogs 100% like it seems you're doing I feel like it is unfair to those who view that as fun on the forum.

Can I have a mod respond to this? I want to know what the status is on the upgrade plans 'cause I haven't seen any news on it lately An update would be nice.

The decision was already made and no amount of discussion or differing opinions will change it. Are you guys forgetting that the explicit ban came directly from THE SITE OWNER? Like, think back to almost 2 years ago when the rules were first made. Britney was relevant, Gaga could push albums, and Hannah Montana was a good Christian girl. It wasn't that long ago. We tried being lenient but people kept pushing their limits further and further.

This thread was opened to respond to any questions regarding content and the future. You guys can complain if you want but the policy is sticking.

Calm yourself, Lee!!. I'm just having a little fun.

he implied u were a girl! You better report and make sure he gets multiple WPs! SainTRL will not stand for this!

Just when you think you can't get anymore warning points you guys throw a couple more things into the mix.

I mean my biggest thing are the avatars. Most of today's popstars are sexual with most of their content especially music videos and performances, I see nothing wrong with having a avatar as my current one or anything else that is somewhat sexual as long as they are covered up or it's obvious popstar related, im not saying were allowed to have avatars of ****s or sex tapes, but you get my point.

If GaGa were to have a performance where she twerks or does something sexual suggested ,but funny I would love to have an avatar of that without once again getting a warning point.

I mean you guys already shoot down people who have obvious sexual suggested avatar, why make it even MORE strict than it already is.

I'm starting to think that with more warnings = its a way for you to tolerate your serves with a huge amount of people getting banned and when they come back a whole other pool is banned and the cycle continues.

That was a very different situation; that did not involve the content or policies of the forum.

that's what makes this thread even funnier you'd think they're being given death sentence after reading their heartfelt speeches

They mentioned it already in this thread. I don't feel like looking for it.