Quote:
Originally posted by ARTPOPULAR
Lol what kind of delusion? You clearly have your own personal problems with her that are deeply rooted in your delusion. But lemme respond.
How is thanking your fans thirsty?! I'm not pretending she's Bjork either....and Bjork isn't Gaga so, Bjork is only relevant as a result of Gaga being compared to her. That's it...so put that back in your box of things to be pressed about.
One of the first things she ever said in her career is that pop will never be low brow, so that's not new and defending pop is not putting yourself on a pedestal.
Try. Again. |
Let me do a statement by statement read here real quick.
Quote:
|
You clearly have your own personal problems with her that are deeply rooted in your delusion.
|
Ad hominem fallacy. Not even going to bother sis, I gave you the **** you asked for and explained myself.
Quote:
|
How is thanking your fans thirsty?! I'm not pretending she's Bjork either....and Bjork isn't Gaga so, Bjork is only relevant as a result of Gaga being compared to her.
|
After Bjork has single handedly progressed the industry with her mind numbing concepts, critically acclaimed albums, and self-invented instruments, of course.
Quote:
|
One of the first things she ever said in her career is that pop will never be low brow, so that's not new and defending pop is not putting yourself on a pedestal.
|
Merriam Webster states:
Quote:
|
: of, relating to, or suitable for a person with little taste or intellectual interest <a lowbrow horror movie>
|
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lowbrow
That's not defending pop. That's a goddamn jab at the genre itself. I mean, she replied to a tweet stating that her song is not a "low brow" pop song so that means that she believes that her music is the guiding light for pop music.
