****'s going down either way.

i dont get why , articles always brings up britneys 2007 meltdown

Originally posted by RCL i dont get why , articles always brings up britneys 2007 meltdown

Ok.

Because she AIN'T here to please you no more.
Mother Spears is coming hard for that urban acclaim.



Now I could care less if Bey is or isn't on the list but does that mean the readers ain't anticipating for ha?
What's wrong with a "readers poll"? A few readers making the list is better than 1 editor.

oh well atleast we can see who the GP is here for

Originally posted by Chill Bill Yeah, they're here for U2, Arcade Fire and Black Sabbath... the so-called "unimportant ones"

Originally posted by RCL but ... voted by readers though oh well atleast we can see who the GP is here for

This is a pop forum. Rolling Stone is a general magazine.



Rolling Stone caters to a general audience, it isn't completely pop based. So yes, the general public.

Oh, can't wait for the highly anticipated albums from David Cook and Josh Krajcik

Originally posted by Chemist RCL stop with your shade Anyway. Cool

Originally posted by americanshameless [CENTER] This is a pop forum. Rolling Stone is a general magazine.

I'm sure the OP meant no harm.


But she better remove the Bey shade and focus on the POSITIVES.

Originally posted by Chill Bill Yeah, I know this is a pop forum, but to call U2 unimportant is just silly.