|
News: Rowling's new book dragged by NY Times
Banned
Member Since: 5/15/2010
Posts: 15,858
|
Rowling's new book dragged by NY Times
Quote:
With J. K. Rowling’s new novel, “The Casual Vacancy,” we are firmly in Muggle-land — about as far from the enchanted world of Harry Potter as we can get. There is no magic in this book — in terms of wizarding or in terms of narrative sorcery. Instead, this novel for adults is filled with a variety of people like Harry’s aunt and uncle, Petunia and Vernon Dursley: self-absorbed, small-minded, snobbish and judgmental folks, whose stories neither engage nor transport us.
It’s easy to understand why Ms. Rowling wanted to try something totally different after spending a decade and a half inventing and complicating the fantasy world that Harry and company inhabited, and one can only admire her gumption in facing up to the overwhelming expectations created by the global phenomenon that was Harry Potter. Unfortunately, the real-life world she has limned in these pages is so willfully banal, so depressingly clichéd that “The Casual Vacancy” is not only disappointing — it’s dull.
The novel — which takes place in the tiny, fictional English village of Pagford, and chronicles the political and personal fallout created by the sudden death of a member of the parish council named Barry Fairbrother — reads like an odd mash-up of a dark soap opera like “Peyton Place” with one of those very British Barbara Pym novels, depicting small-town, circumscribed lives.
This is definitely not a book for children: suicide, rape, heroin addiction, beatings and thoughts of patricide percolate through its pages; there is a sex scene set in a cemetery, a grotesque description of a used condom (“glistening in the grass beside her feet, like the gossamer cocoon of some huge grub”) and alarming scenes of violent domestic abuse.
The novel contains moments of genuine drama and flashes here and there of humor, but it ends on such a disheartening note with two more abrupt, crudely stage-managed deaths that the reader is left stumbling about with whatever is the opposite of the emotions evoked by the end of the “Harry Potter” series.
Instead of an appreciation for the courage, perseverance, loyalty and sense of duty that people are capable of, we are left with a dismaying sense of human weakness, selfishness and gossipy stupidity. Instead of an exhilarating sense of the mythic possibilities of storytelling, we are left with a numbing understanding of the difficulty of turning a dozen or so people’s tales into a story with genuine emotional resonance.
Many authors, of course, have created portraits of small-town life that capture the texture of ordinary lives with great depth of emotion. This, alas, is not the case here. Whereas the Harry Potter universe was as richly imagined and intricately detailed as Tolkien’s Middle Earth or L. Frank Baum’s Oz, Pagford seems oddly generic — a toy village, in which rooftops pop off to reveal adultery, marital discord and generational conflict among the tiny toy people. It’s as though writing about the real world inhibited Ms. Rowling’s miraculously inventive imagination, and in depriving her of the tension between the mundane and the marvelous constrained her ability to create a two-, never mind three-dimensional tale.
As “The Casual Vacancy” trundles along and Ms. Rowling starts grappling with the consequences of her characters’ darker secrets, the narrative gathers momentum, but it takes a lot of pages to get there.
In the meantime we are treated to tedious descriptions of the political squabbles exacerbated by Barry Fairbrother’s death and historical accounts of class tensions in insular Pagford — most notably a face-off between one faction that is opposed to a public housing project and a clinic for addicts, and another that has a sense of duty toward the less fortunate.
It’s a subject with the potential to reverberate with an American audience — given the current battles between Republicans and Democrats over the role and size of government — but as laid out here it’s oddly bloodless and abstract.
In some respects “The Casual Vacancy” is grappling with many of the same themes as the Harry Potter books: the losses and burdens of responsibility that come with adulthood, and the stubborn fact of mortality. One of the things that made Harry’s story so affecting was Ms. Rowling’s ability to construct a parallel world enlivened by the supernatural, and yet instantly recognizable to us as a place where death and the precariousness of daily life cannot be avoided, a place where identity is as much a product of deliberate choice as it is of fate. What’s missing here is an emotional depth of field. It’s not just because the stakes in this novel are so much smaller. (In “Harry Potter,” the civil war was literally between good and evil; here, it is between petty, gossip-minded liberals and conservatives.) It’s that the characters in “The Casual Vacancy” feel so much less fully imagined than the ones in the Harry Potter epic.
There is Gavin, Fairbrother’s best friend, who turns out to be in love with his widow; Fairbrother’s opponent, the extravagantly obese Howard Mollison, who considers himself the First Citizen of Pagford; Krystal Weedon, a skanky girl from the projects, and her junkie mother, Terri; Krystal’s new social worker, Kay Bawden, who has recently moved to Pagford with her teenage daughter; the disaffected adolescent boys, Fats and Andrew; and a variety of local gossips and pot-stirrers.
Such characters are drawn in brisk, broad strokes, and with little of the complex ambiguity that fueled the later Harry Potter installments. In fact, there is a vacancy deep in the heart of this novel.
We do not come away feeling that we know the back stories of the “Vacancy” characters in intimate detail the way we did with Harry and his friends and enemies, nor do we finish the novel with a visceral knowledge of how their pasts — and their families’ pasts — have informed their present lives. Of course, Ms. Rowling had seven volumes to map out the intricacies of the wizarding world in Harry Potter. The reader can only hope she doesn’t try to flesh out the Muggle world of Pagford in any further volumes, but instead moves on to something more compelling and deeply felt in the future.
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/27/bo...ling.html?_r=1
I hate that the reviewer dragged The Casual Vacancy by comparing it to a masterpiece like Harry Potter. The story, the worlds,the characters and the targeted demographics are totally different so review the book for what it is and not for what it should be...

|
|
|
Member Since: 2/25/2012
Posts: 3,102
|
Bitch should never have stopped writing Harry Potter, I need me the Life and Lies of Albus Dumbledore and another series of 5-7 books following Albus Severus Potter. kthanksbi
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/14/2012
Posts: 2,710
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Wings
Bitch should never have stopped writing Harry Potter, I need me the Life and Lies of Albus dumbledore and another series of 5-7 books following Albus Severus Potter. kthanksbi
|
+1
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/9/2011
Posts: 4,876
|
Good, this woman only writes trash.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/13/2011
Posts: 19,555
|
Whatevs, I'm gonna buy it later.
Not expecting anything HP but I'm excited to read it.
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/11/2011
Posts: 15,290
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chickenchiki
Good, this woman only writes trash.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/7/2012
Posts: 8,404
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Wings
Bitch should never have stopped writing Harry Potter, I need me the Life and Lies of Albus Dumbledore and another series of 5-7 books following Albus Severus Potter. kthanksbi
|
No shade or a Dumbledore/Grindlewald trilogy!
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/6/2012
Posts: 15,374
|
Is this the book with a character inspired by Rihanna? not surprised then

|
|
|
Member Since: 2/25/2012
Posts: 3,102
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DimmiFenty
No shade or a Dumbledore/Grindlewald trilogy!
|
Add that to my list of things I want from her. That would be super special awesome.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 5/15/2010
Posts: 15,858
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chickenchiki
Good, this woman only writes trash.
|
You tried it, sis.

|
|
|
Member Since: 3/3/2011
Posts: 23,567
|
Of course people are ready to trash her. She's the most commercially successful author of all time, and wrote a series of books that received universal acclaim, bridged all age groups, defined a generation, revived the coolness of reading, and destroyed every record known to the industry. There was never anything she could do to please people after that, and that's okay. She doesn't owe anything to people, and at least she's trying something new that she wants to do.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/30/2011
Posts: 6,553
|
Good. It's awful.
Quote:
Originally posted by Wings
Bitch should never have stopped writing Harry Potter, I need me the Life and Lies of Albus Dumbledore and another series of 5-7 books following Albus Severus Potter. kthanksbi
|
Boring. All the 'bad guys' are dead, it'd be just as sugary sweet and cutesy perfect as the last chapter of book 7, and that was cringeworthy. She needs to write about the time before the original books.
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/28/2012
Posts: 2,182
|
I'll give it a try later this year
Quote:
Originally posted by Chickenchiki
Good, this woman only writes trash.
|

|
|
|
Member Since: 2/25/2012
Posts: 3,102
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Neptune
Good. It's awful.
Boring. All the 'bad guys' are dead, it'd be just as sugary sweet and cutesy perfect as the last chapter of book 7, and that was cringeworthy. She needs to write about the time before the original books.
|
The whole premise of the first book series was that the Dark Lord would rise again.
If she could incorporate an original way to utilize Voldemort again with a new band of followers that would be kick ass. Open your imagination.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 8/16/2011
Posts: 9,414
|
I knew this wouldn't do well
Her writing's overrated 
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/11/2012
Posts: 82
|
 y'all bitches need to quit.
lol sucks to be her though. this book might actually be decent but damn if the reviewers and the public will get over HP.
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/6/2010
Posts: 27,892
|
Damn, they dragged her for FILTH.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/7/2012
Posts: 5,478
|
Whoever doesn't like the book okay, but who writes reviews?! Someone mindless, obviously.
|
|
|
Member Since: 7/22/2012
Posts: 18,064
|
Quote:
Originally posted by stiles
 y'all bitches need to quit.
lol sucks to be her though. this book might actually be decent but damn if the reviewers and the public will get over HP.
|
I agree people need to realize HP is over and will not come back time to move on
I'll probably get the book anyways
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/11/2012
Posts: 14,421
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Wings
The whole premise of the first book series was that the Dark Lord would rise again.
If she could incorporate an original way to utilize Voldemort again with a new band of followers that would be kick ass. Open your imagination.
|
Bring him back again?  This is not Friday the 13th where Jason just keeps coming back over and over again, JK made a real saga out of his rise and fall at the hands of Harry, he needs to stay dead. I agree with whoever said that, if she made more, it would need to be prequels.
|
|
|
|
|