|
Celeb News: Sharon Osbourne responds to Gaga
Member Since: 5/31/2012
Posts: 951
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/19/2011
Posts: 4,294
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Artemisia
But sharon never touted herself as a defender of animal rights.
Gaga has.
|
!!!! Exactly.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/7/2011
Posts: 8,226
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rentboy
nope I didn't declare that to be the reason I dislike her I said it will likely get me posting here. I could list reasons I dont like her but thats not what the threads about. I'm "bashing" her here because she's specifically going after somebody I like.
I get the publicity thing. Being a Madonna fan you can't not.
|
What does this supposed to mean? That you could care less about the points and facts (well I would assume so since you kept saying that Gaga complained about being judged for her fashion when that is not in the letter) and more about bashing Gaga simply because she is on the opposing side of an argument with a the person you like. Way to go man. You just put a huge spotlight on your real intentions. Wow
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/21/2011
Posts: 6,530
|
Stupid Gaga
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/16/2012
Posts: 5,660
|
Both Sharon and Kelly are hypocrites.
For somebody who openly wears LEATHER then has the courage to call Gaga out for wearing fur and meat is bull****. And let's not act like Sharon didn't invite cameras into her home for five years - "attention seeker" who?
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/27/2012
Posts: 6,274
|
Nnn drag ha to tha pits Sharon
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/11/2011
Posts: 1,999
|
Sharon is a little monster, so she says. She's just angry that Gaga called Kelly out. And the delusion of her thinking that Gaga can control 32 million people with one tweet. I hope this keeps going, I would love to see how Gaga responds.
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/13/2011
Posts: 8,525
|
Quote:
Originally posted by VertigoStick
Sharon just brought Cynthia into this. Really?
Gaga doesn't wear fur.
|
jhfkjhfjkfhkdfjdkl;jfkljl
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/11/2011
Posts: 1,999
|
Quote:
Originally posted by gettsleazy
jhfkjhfjkfhkdfjdkl;jfkljl
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/13/2012
Posts: 492
|
... at Sharon clocking Gaga for wearing fur, when Ozzy ate a bat on stage.
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/13/2012
Posts: 492
|
Remember when Gaga wore Kelly's fur though?
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/17/2010
Posts: 2,570
|
Ooopsss she clocked her This wont end well
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/12/2012
Posts: 13,665
|
I don't know, if this was a thema before, this is a post from digitalspy
Quote:
No, what prompted the letter was a PRIVATE email from Sharon (as Kelly's manager) asking GaGa if she could use her influence with the most rabid of her fans (and a lot of these people have very scary fans!) - which she would have as their 'idol' - to try to stop their vile and nasty outpourings (not just to Kelly but other as well). Then there was a second (private) request - not from Kelly herself, but again from her mother/manager. GaGa then chose to respond publicly.
There's nothing hypocritical about asking someone if they can stop their fans sending death threats and if you seriously think that just because someone is hypocritical or has other faults that they should be subject to the type of behaviour some of these fans exhibit (and GaGa isn't the only one to have these seriously disturbed people following her) - with appalling remarks, death threats and encouragement to commit suicide, then I feel very sorry for you. Because two wrongs don't make a right.
The letter should never have been made public. It only serves to validate the behaviour of these rabid people (the fans, that is). Now they will act with even more impunity against not just Kelly but others they see as having 'wronged' their idol.
It's sick. I feel very sorry for them in a way because they obviously know no better. I just hope that one day, when they grow up, they will see the error of their ways and regret what they spewed out in public against someone they've never met.
And, reading the transcript of what the FP people said - Kelly was being perfectly reasonable. She just said she preferred GaGa when .... etc. She didn't say she looked like the back end of a bus or anything vicious. That was Joan. If there was really an issue with the FP, then she should have written to the producers and complained, not singled out Kelly, who didn't actually have anything particularly bad to say about her.
This whole thing is very sad.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/21/2010
Posts: 51,088
|
People are still talking about this? Because Gaga sure isn't.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 2/6/2012
Posts: 18,398
|
From tumblr
Quote:
It’s interesting to see how Sharon’s had to jump in to defend Kelly because in her history of celebrity feuds, she’s never been able to speak for herself. It’s also interesting how she completely ignored any comments about the “libelous, slanderous and vile comments” that Kelly’s made. It’s interesting to see how when Kelly calls Christina Aguilera a “fat bitch” or claims that Gaga is pregnant because of her weight gain, or makes any catty comment about a celebrity, her response is “welcome to the real world”, yet when a minority of Gaga fans attack Kelly for her comments about Gaga, the world stops rotating, the sun is extinguished and the planets exit their orbits until it stops.
Sharon needs to realise that Kelly is no angel. Any episode of “Fashion Police” features her sitting alongside Joan Rivers “pointing in the camera, laughing, and making jokes about artists and celebrities as if we are zoo animals”, a point which Sharon CLEARLY dodged in her letter, claiming that she “doesn’t have to justify her daughter’s actions”. The fact that she COMPLETELY ignores Kelly’s bitchy, catty comments and tries to derail the conversation by pointing to Gaga’s clothing further proves that SHE is the “attention seeking hypocrite”.
Kelly herself said that she “has no filter” and “says what she thinks”, a hollow euphemism for “I will say what I want to say no matter how bitchy, disrespectful, catty or rude it is”. Sharon here is labelling Gaga as an “attention seeking hypocrite” and generalising a 32 million person fanbase based on a minority that attacked Kelly after she called Gaga “disrespectful” for not walking the red carpet at the 2012 Grammys. So the Osbournes can make whatever bitchy, disrespectful, catty, inappropriate comments about everything else based on the fact that the have “no filter”, but the moment anybody says ANYTHING about them it has to be decanted, centrifuged, evaporated, distilled, sublimed, sieved and filtered? Right.
While we’re on the topic of Kelly telling Gaga what she should do, we here have a tweet by Kelly saying “I know who I am and don’t need anybody to tell me!”. Let’s review that. Kelly says Gaga is disrespectful for not walking the red carpet. Kelly tells Gaga what to do. Kelly tells Gaga who to be. A year later, Kelly backtracks and claims that nobody should tell her who to be. Oops.
And here we have Kelly saying that “I’ve had this all my life and I just try and ignore it.” So I have to ask, if she’s had this all her life and has been oh so successful in ignoring it, then why is she specifically targeting Lady Gaga’s fanbase? Because she knows it’s the biggest pop fanbase? Because she knows that it will give her a headline? Because she knows that it will give her attention? Something that Sharon herself attacked Gaga for when she claimed the Meat Dress was a ploy for attention, when in fact it was a commentary on human rights? The Osbournes need to ask themselves who the “attention seeking hypocrite” REALLY is. They also need to invest in a mirror.
“Welcome to the real world”, Sharon says in response to Gaga calling out Kelly on the “libelous, slanderous and vile comments” she makes on Fashion Police. The moral of the story is it’s okay for Kelly Osbourne to bully people because that’s part of “the real world” but you’re strictly forbidden from talking **** about her.
“Welcome to the real world.” Perhaps Sharon should tell her daughter to follow the same advice.
|
Well ****.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/27/2012
Posts: 3,188
|
YASSSS SHARON GORL you tell that ****ing idiot.
Sharonownage. You do NOT **** with her.
Not a single lie was told, Gaga's letter was ****ing ridiculous, daring to bash someone for their career. Well guess what, bitch? YOUR career consists of nothing more than unimaginative generic rehashed **** whose popularity is an embarrassment to humanity.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2013
Posts: 2,208
|
The pressed lessors basking in Gaga's glory!
Y'all should live of your own hussle.
Tbh, Gaga replied politely on the matter and just because she shared some home truths that made Kelly look like an idiot, her mum felt the need to defend her with her foul mouth.
Sorry but who is Sharon? What has she contributed to society? To music?
oh...she married a famous rockstar. ok. plz judge me Sharon, plz.
stupid b*tch.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/7/2011
Posts: 8,226
|
Quote:
It’s interesting to see how Sharon’s had to jump in to defend Kelly because in her history of celebrity feuds, she’s never been able to speak for herself. It’s also interesting how she completely ignored any comments about the “libelous, slanderous and vile comments” that Kelly’s made. It’s interesting to see how when Kelly calls Christina Aguilera a “fat bitch” or claims that Gaga is pregnant because of her weight gain, or makes any catty comment about a celebrity, her response is “welcome to the real world”, yet when a minority of Gaga fans attack Kelly for her comments about Gaga, the world stops rotating, the sun is extinguished and the planets exit their orbits until it stops.
Sharon needs to realise that Kelly is no angel. Any episode of “Fashion Police” features her sitting alongside Joan Rivers “pointing in the camera, laughing, and making jokes about artists and celebrities as if we are zoo animals”, a point which Sharon CLEARLY dodged in her letter, claiming that she “doesn’t have to justify her daughter’s actions”. The fact that she COMPLETELY ignores Kelly’s bitchy, catty comments and tries to derail the conversation by pointing to Gaga’s clothing further proves that SHE is the “attention seeking hypocrite”.
Kelly herself said that she “has no filter” and “says what she thinks”, a hollow euphemism for “I will say what I want to say no matter how bitchy, disrespectful, catty or rude it is”. Sharon here is labelling Gaga as an “attention seeking hypocrite” and generalising a 32 million person fanbase based on a minority that attacked Kelly after she called Gaga “disrespectful” for not walking the red carpet at the 2012 Grammys. So the Osbournes can make whatever bitchy, disrespectful, catty, inappropriate comments about everything else based on the fact that the have “no filter”, but the moment anybody says ANYTHING about them it has to be decanted, centrifuged, evaporated, distilled, sublimed, sieved and filtered? Right.
While we’re on the topic of Kelly telling Gaga what she should do, we here have a tweet by Kelly saying “I know who I am and don’t need anybody to tell me!”. Let’s review that. Kelly says Gaga is disrespectful for not walking the red carpet. Kelly tells Gaga what to do. Kelly tells Gaga who to be. A year later, Kelly backtracks and claims that nobody should tell her who to be. Oops.
And here we have Kelly saying that “I’ve had this all my life and I just try and ignore it.” So I have to ask, if she’s had this all her life and has been oh so successful in ignoring it, then why is she specifically targeting Lady Gaga’s fanbase? Because she knows it’s the biggest pop fanbase? Because she knows that it will give her a headline? Because she knows that it will give her attention? Something that Sharon herself attacked Gaga for when she claimed the Meat Dress was a ploy for attention, when in fact it was a commentary on human rights? The Osbournes need to ask themselves who the “attention seeking hypocrite” REALLY is. They also need to invest in a mirror.
“Welcome to the real world”, Sharon says in response to Gaga calling out Kelly on the “libelous, slanderous and vile comments” she makes on Fashion Police. The moral of the story is it’s okay for Kelly Osbourne to bully people because that’s part of “the real world” but you’re strictly forbidden from talking **** about her.
“Welcome to the real world.” Perhaps Sharon should tell her daughter to follow the same advice.
|
TRUTH
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/12/2012
Posts: 13,665
|
Quote:
Originally posted by LadyLana
The pressed lessors basking in Gaga's glory!
Y'all should live of your own hussle.
Tbh, Gaga replied politely on the matter and just because she shared some home truths that made Kelly look like an idiot, her mum felt the need to defend her with her foul mouth.
Sorry but who is Sharon? What has she contributed to society? To music?
oh...she married a famous rockstar. ok. plz judge me Sharon, plz.
stupid b*tch.
|
So young at this board and already full of hatred.
Sharon is a daughter of an former label executive, when she become acquainted with Ozzy he was almost dead. She saved his life and managed Ozzy successful and she is also the manager of Kelly, so she has something to say on behalf of her client.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/7/2011
Posts: 8,226
|
Quote:
Originally posted by OprahIsBlack
YASSSS SHARON GORL you tell that ****ing idiot.
Sharonownage. You do NOT **** with her.
Not a single lie was told, Gaga's letter was ****ing ridiculous, daring to bash someone for their career. Well guess what, bitch? YOUR career consists of nothing more than unimaginative generic rehashed **** whose popularity is an embarrassment to humanity.
|
That's right. React just how Sharon did. With cynicism and trashy insults just like people at the bottom of the barrel act. Thank you for proving Gaga's point
|
|
|
|
|