Quote:
Originally posted by Praise Mariallah
Neither of those pictures are sexual in nature. It's just the female body. If you can't look at the female body without viewing it as a sexual object then you've got quite the male chauvinistic attitude.
|
I agree that the left image isn't sexual. It's just a little bit of skin, all her sex organs are very covered up.
But the one on the right? Call me dirty minded but... she's cupping her right breast and palming her vagina with her legs spread wide open with half opened/heavy lidded eyes and with bed head. I would argue that it's highly suggestive. If merely one finger was positioned slightly differently or her facial expression a little more orgasmic, it would be straight up soft core ****ography. I personally think there's a fine line between embracing the beauty of the female figure and being sexually suggestive. She knows it would be taken that way, so of course she did it on purpose. There are very many other ways to embrace nudity without making the mind rush to sex.
On that note though, I really don't think it was trashy or anything of that sort. I think it's sexual but tasteful, and that little quote seems to be more about more sleazy representations of sexuality. Just a guess though. Or she changed her mind?
She's a single and album artist and she and y'all will deal. 
