I'm an audiophile and a mixer, anyone that knows audio files well will tell you that iTunes has really bad quality. BTW, how is 320kps worse then a 256kps
It's well known that M4A is better quality than MP3.
I'm an audiophile and a mixer, anyone that knows audio files well will tell you that iTunes has really bad quality. BTW, how is 320kps worse then a 256kps
Stop trying Robbie, stop. We all know those flac files are better quality so calm down.
It's just annoying me that you assume file type = quality. And though P!nk was wrong about 256 being above 320, 256 is not "bad" quality. It's better than 192 or 56.
so iTunes an official music store where more then 3 quaters of the world get their official music from is really bad quality.......................................... kk
also these irish people need to get to the upload PUH-LEASE
In any case, 256kps is fine for a normal listener, not trying to say that. Ipod heapdhones aren't gonna tell the difference between 256kps and a lossless one.
It's just annoying me that you assume file type = quality. And though P!nk was wrong about 256 being above 320, 256 is not "bad" quality. It's better than 192 or 56.
M4A 256kbps matches or is better sound quality (not quite sure which) than MP3 320kbps.
It's just annoying me that you assume file type = quality. And though P!nk was wrong about 256 being above 320, 256 is not "bad" quality. It's better than 192 or 56.
I never said that though STOP PUTTING WORDS IN MY MOUTH. No one makes flac files that are 56kps, if they do they're dumb. It's bad quality to me cause of my audio set up. Sit.
i hope it leaks guys
Enjoy!
