[[Bask]]

Originally posted by B94

See even Britney who has the weakest voice is more versatile than Kelly.





Christina >>> Kelly as far as versatility goes.

Originally posted by Mr. Know It All

Well, in all fairness, a computer/Speak-and-Spell will always be more versatile than Kelly ever could be.

[supertiffany]

Originally posted by MJ0497

Omg. Lmao @ the delusion in this entire post. I LOVE Britney just as much as the next person, but Not a chance in hell.

Originally posted by [Bask]

you actually give attention and reply to that poster?



that member has been hating Kelly in almost of posts.


Credibility zero.



opps, spilled the true tea.

[Signs]

No.

[Callisto.]

Originally posted by MJ0497

Doubt she was forgotten. Bey is an amazing vocalist but she doesn't ">>>>>>>" Kelly in the slightest. Beyonce is not overly versatile. She's great at what she does but that's about it IMO.

Kelly can sing genre circles around Bey. That's WHY I stan for her.

Pop


Rock


Broadway


R&B


Countryish or whatever it is.


Jazz


Gospel


I don't care if you think Kelly is better or not, but don't try to say Beyonce is not versatile when she clearly is.

[Haven]

Do my eyes deceive me? Or am i really watching people claim that Britney Spears has a versatile voice?

[Praise Mariallah]

Christina IS more versatile than Kelly though.

[UnusualBoy]

I'd say yes, she's sung almost every genre something other girls haven't done yet.

[jpsketch]

"broadway" is not a genre.

[MJ Boston]

Originally posted by iBeyoncé.

I don't care if you think Kelly is better or not, but don't try to say Beyonce is not versatile when she clearly is.

I didn't say she isn't versatile. I said she isn't OVERLY versatile. I don't think she pulls off some of those genres well.. (and as someone else pointed out, Broadway isn't a genre)..I've seen the receipts. Just because the song is a different genre and someone sings it doesn't mean they're successful at being versatile.

I stand by Kelly being much more versatile than Bey.

[B94]

Originally posted by Haven17

Do my eyes deceive me? Or am i really watching people claim that Britney Spears has a versatile voice?

Anybody can do different genres, but can they change their voice to fit that genre? Britney can change her tone and sing in different styles, while Kelly not so much. Of all those videos of Kelly, she sounds exactly the "SAME", that's not versatility. And you guys have the nerve to call her vocalist of this generation when that title should go to Christina who is way more versatile.

[Amaru]

Originally posted by Haven17

Do my eyes deceive me? Or am i really watching people claim that Britney Spears has a versatile voice?

where is the lie

[Praise Mariallah]

The people in here saying some of those videos are Punk Rock, Classical, and Country. A guitar doesn't make a song country anymore than a powerful belt makes a bitch an Opera singer.

[Haven]

Originally posted by B94

Anybody can do different genres, but can they change their voice to fit that genre? Britney can change her tone and sing in different styles, while Kelly not so much. Of all those videos of Kelly, she sounds exactly the "SAME", that's not versatility. And you guys have the nerve to call her vocalist of this generation when that title should go to Christina who is way more versatile.

You make a fair point. But that last part about Christina, though....

[jpsketch]

Originally posted by Praise Mariallah

The people in here saying some of those videos are Punk Rock, Classical, and Country. A guitar doesn't make a song country anymore than a powerful belt makes a bitch an Opera singer.

Oh sis...



This is clearly a country song.



This is clearly Brit Punk.

[Praise Mariallah]

Originally posted by face

It does take technique to be as versatile as Christina is, particularly in the way she is versatile. When she sings in different genres, her singing itself changes. This might sound axiomatic, but it is indeed different from singers like Kelly Clarkson, who is actually a very versatile singer in a different way; she just happens to be one of those very lucky singers (Elvis is another good example) whose voices tend to suit a large number of genres without making extreme (though there's obviously some) technical changes to their singing style when shifting to a different genre. Personally I think it is a gift that very few singers have.

Which is exactly why Christina has a more versatile VOICE.

Tea being spilled from a Kelly stan himself

[Praise Mariallah]

Originally posted by Mickey

Well, there's a big difference between singing many different genres and singing many different styles. I mean, I'd say that Christina sings in many more different styles than Kelly. Kelly can just sing the same and it fits pop music, country music, rock music...

The truest tea has been spilled. /Thread

[B94]

Originally posted by Haven17

You make a fair point. But that last part about Christina, though....

When you sing a certain genre it should sound exactly like that genre. Christina is pretty much the only artist who can do that. I wont say Kelly isn't versatile, but she is not more versatile than Christina.

[Praise Mariallah]

Originally posted by jpsketch

Oh sis...



This is clearly a country song.

That song is apart of a newly adapted genre called, "Taylor Swift", not country. And country is a very broad genre with different sub-genres like, Bluegrass, Nashville, Classic, etc.

[Lippy]

She is deffo one of the biggest "chameleons". Nelly Furtado, Rihanna are the others big.

[EdgeOfAddiction]

Originally posted by Amaru

where is the lie

Is this Britney shade? No me gusta. You will acknowledge her versatility and revel in her glory. Just like you should revel in Kelly's velvety vocals.