[Queen Bea.]

Originally posted by Amaru

Taylor did not deserve that grammy. I don't care what any of you say. She knows that, her fans know that, the lord and savior jesus christ knows that.

Yet she won it and so everyone will deal while Queen Taylor polishes her most prestigious of awards for her immature fairytale style writing.

[ChrisRTW]

Originally posted by TheOnlyOne

Not a chance in hell. Mindless pop fluff and nothing more. It was nominated because of the "comeback" not due to quality.

True

[Stepfon]

Originally posted by YeaBey4ever

Exactly! I for one, am not saying she shouldn't have any Grammys because she deserves a few more but at the same time, there are some areas where I think she wouldn't deserve it. No need to attack...

The Britney stans are claiming Razzies as MAJOR victories now. Did the Beyonce stans celebrate when she got her nomination for Worst Actress? WHO ELSE but the Britney stans would do that?

[Cap10Planet]

Originally posted by Amaru

Taylor did not deserve that grammy. I don't care what any of you say. She knows that, her fans know that, the lord and savior jesus christ knows that.

Who deserved to win?

[PopBoi]

I don't think its down to her singles, personally I think its her albums that deserve it. Mainly In The Zone and Blackout.

[Queen Bea.]

Originally posted by Stepfon

The Britney stans are claiming Razzies as MAJOR victories now. Did the Beyonce stans celebrate when she got her nomination for Worst Actress? WHO ELSE but the Britney stans would do that?

Maybe they just have a sense of humour...not being shady I'm being genuine. I mean if Queen Sandra can see the funny side so can Brithey and her fans.

[YoYo]

Originally posted by Bea.

...still don't get it's relevance to be honest. Pretty much all top grammy winners are famous for the flawless quality of their music, so why shouldn't Britney be up there? Huh?

I'm saying how the quality of the music she makes isn't inferior to that of her pop peers who also happen to have more grammys. What I said was in response of Rihanna fans acting how Britney's music is inferior to their idol's and that's why she doesn't have more grammys.

Originally posted by TheOnlyOne

Not a chance in hell. Mindless pop fluff and nothing more. It was nominated because of the "comeback" not due to quality.

^ This being exhibit A.

[Queen Bea.]

Originally posted by PopBoi

I don't think its down to her singles, personally I think its her albums that deserve it. Mainly In The Zone and Blackout.

In the Zone is her best album and should have gotton more awards, I blame the knee injury for that.

Breathe On Me is the best song of her career.

[Stepfon]

Originally posted by Bea.

Maybe they just have a sense of humour...not being shady I'm being genuine. I mean if Queen Sandra can see the funny side so can Brithey and her fans.

I honestly think they were being serious. But, anyway, this thread has been a lot of fun to read, and comment on, I see it won't be ending anytime soon, so I am just going to enjoy the posts and sit back.

[CaptainMusic]

Originally posted by TheOnlyOne

Not a chance in hell. Mindless pop fluff and nothing more. It was nominated because of the "comeback" not due to quality.

What? Seriously? I knew you were pressed but you really think that? They nominated her song because of a comeback....okay.

You're an idiot.

[TheOnlyOne]

Originally posted by Amaru

Taylor did not deserve that grammy. I don't care what any of you say. She knows that, her fans know that, the lord and savior jesus christ knows that.

The voting academy at the Grammys >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any opinion you've ever had.

[BnPac]

Originally posted by IDRAG4MJ

LMAOO ....If rihanna has grammys ..britney sure as hell deserves them more...because when we talk about talent ..britney has tones more

Well they have the same amount of solo grammy. It's just the way the nominations are, JayZ is a big contender in winning Rap/sung or rap collaboration. If Britney sang with JayZ or a big grammy favorite like Kanye West or Eminem, she might have that chance.

[Queen Bea.]

Fun fact guys, the Beatles only won 6 grammies and they aren't doing too shabby even decades after their hayday.

They aren't everything.

[ChrisRTW]

Originally posted by CaptainMusic

What? Seriously? I knew you were pressed but you really think that? They nominated her song because of a comeback....okay.

You're an idiot.

[Mole]

Originally posted by TheOnlyOne

The voting academy at the Grammys >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any opinion you've ever had.

You know sometimes the voting academies ARE biased towards what people 'want'?

[PopBoi]

Originally posted by Bea.

In the Zone is her best album and should have gotton more awards, I blame the knee injury for that.

Basically. Everytime, Toxic, In The Zone and Blackout are all grammy worthy IMO.

[KORDEI]

Originally posted by Stepfon

The Britney stans are claiming Razzies as MAJOR victories now. Did the Beyonce stans celebrate when she got her nomination for Worst Actress? WHO ELSE but the Britney stans would do that?

Us Bey stans often make jokes about Bey's acting so we really don't care...lol.. Razzies aren't anything to run around and brag about though...

[Queen Bea.]

Originally posted by PopBoi

Basically. Everytime, Toxic, In The Zone and Blackout are all grammy worthy IMO.

I think Blackout is hugely over-rated. I mean yeah it started a musical movement but it isn't even in my top 3 Britney albums.

[Stepfon]

Originally posted by Amaru

Taylor did not deserve that grammy. I don't care what any of you say. She knows that, her fans know that, the lord and savior jesus christ knows that.

The sales, the critical acclaim, and the impact of the album all prove your statement to be wrong.

[TheOnlyOne]

Originally posted by PopBoi

Basically. Everytime, Toxic, In The Zone and Blackout are all grammy worthy IMO.

The people who matter disagreed, obviously.