[Louie]

Originally posted by JoaoP

this has to be a joke... Lmao. Lets just no compare looks ridiculous to me.

Obviously, like most the of people that posted, you didn't read the article but came here commenting on the title of the thread.

This article compares the fact that Britney is the only artist aside MJ who dominates the world without doing any promo, any interviews, etc. they get natural buzz.

He also compared the fact that their "ruined" public images didn't effect their careers.

[Harry]

I didn't bother to read that long ass post on the first page but comparing Britney to the late MJ is a lil' too much even if 'It's Britney, bitch!' we're talking about. She's definitely huge in her own way but I guess it's not the time yet to do such comparison. I must say this is one of the biggest delusions I've ever seen on ATRL.

[brIt-()nstar]

Originally posted by inspiration4

NO. Michael Jackson had a brilliant understanding of and ability to create music. He was an artist. He was a

Songwriter

Composer

Performer
etc

Britney is only a performer, that's it.


.....






we all know only ONE pop star currently wears all those hats and more

Briney is a songwriter, composer, and performer. Gurl, bye...

[Louie]

Originally posted by HarrySapphire

I didn't bother to read that long ass post on the first page but comparing Britney to the late MJ is a lil' too much even if 'It's Britney, bitch!' we're talking about. She's definitely huge in her own way but I guess it's not the time yet to do such comparison. I must say this is one of the biggest delusions I've ever seen on ATRL.

You can't judge a book by its cover. If the article was based on comparing Britney Spears and Michael Jackson's overall credibility then your post would be valid.

[OnlyRihanna]

She can't be ...

[Harry]

Originally posted by Louie

You can't judge a book by its cover. If the article was based on comparing Britney Spears and Michael Jackson's overall credibility then your post would be valid.

Sis I can'ttt. If I were to judge a book by its cover, then Brit will definitely win by default (if the cover you're talking about is looks). I will not deny that Britney is the biggest bitch in music industry right now, IMO she towers over Gaga, Bey, Riri, etc but let's face it, until she could exceed Madonna's level, MJ is just a whole another story.

Yes, you could say she's as big as MJ in his first 12 years, the strong aura, fame and popularity but the argument remains flawed.

[manwhore]

A blog said.. Still not as hilarious as mtv publishing a "thought"

[RainMan]

I love the comparison as they are two of my favourite artists.

But i think it is less that britney is like MJ and more that she is on the same level as MJ, Madonna and Mariah Carey.

[zach]

Britney is Britney. Michael is Michael.

[izzy]

this is def one of the most delusional things I ever read here

[UAE]

When She'll Win 8 Grammy's In One Night I Might Consider It..

Michael is Michael No One Is The Next Michael He Impacted The Earth Like No Other Artist.. and No Artist in The Industry Now Did What Half He Did 20 and 30 Years Ago .. !!

[caerbayn]

There is only one other artist who could have dropped a single, grant no radio interviews, no live performances, and no buzz campaign — and have it arrive to this kind of reception. His name was Michael Jackson.

This is really a flimsy basis for comparison.

The woman went on a world tour of sold out venues just a year after she was admitted into a psychiatric hospital after suffering a mental breakdown … who else could do something like that? Michael Jackson, that’s who.

And so is this.

Michael Jackson was an incredible musician, an excellent performer and made music that was innovative. If people want to compare they should start from those basics. NOT single buzz and media controversy.

[Legend ReX]

In terms of impact... maybe but in terms performances/style, not really. Michael is Michael, Britney is Britney.

[Comedor]

Is this a flamebait? Cause I'm about to bite.

[Duca]

She's much better and she should never be compared to him.

[Louie]

Originally posted by HarrySapphire

Sis I can'ttt. If I were to judge a book by its cover, then Brit will definitely win by default (if the cover you're talking about is looks). I will not deny that Britney is the biggest bitch in music industry right now, IMO she towers over Gaga, Bey, Riri, etc but let's face it, until she could exceed Madonna's level, MJ is just a whole another story.

Yes, you could say she's as big as MJ in his first 12 years, the strong aura, fame and popularity but the argument remains flawed.

Again, the article was about the fact that they don't need to promote to be successful. That's all.

[Bones]

Naaa

[RainMan]

I think she will surpass Michael Jackson and even Madonna.

She has already accomplished what they took 25 years to accomplish.

[satellites.™]

Originally posted by D.M.F

Ummm I don't think so. More like Janet or Jermaine, for right now at least.

Ahhhhhhhhh

[Lipton]

Originally posted by DX7

No. She's the new Queen of Pop. If Madonna doesn't release a new album AND impact worldwide, then her job is done.

Madonna has nothing left to prove. You don't lose titles like that.