[Lord Blackout]

Originally posted by that G.U.Y.

The leaks aren't what cost Hillary the election tho.

She campaigned against coal, against rural Americans.

Not to mention her emails and Benghazi.

It's not fair and I would love for Hillary to be president instead of Trump but I will not be foolish and say that it's all Russia's fault. That's ignorant

Those are ALL reasons. However, when you lose by 80,000 but win the pop vote by 2.8m, it's safe to say that the absence of any of those factors would have altered the outcome. This is why I don't get the "Sore losers. Keep blaming Russia" argument when it neglects the fact that Trump won MANY swing states by very slim margins.

[Bloo]

She campaigned against coal, against rural Americans.

She didn't campaign against coal, she campaigned for renewable energy and to renew those coal communities to provide them jobs to work in that sector.

Not to mention her emails and Benghazi.

The email issue got exacerbated by Russian hacks. That's irrefutable. Had Russia not brought that strongly back into the media, in conjunction with Comey, then the emails wouldn't have been that big of a deal.

Benghazi was basically a non-factor. Nothing came from it past the Senatorial hearings.

[Bloo]

Originally posted by Bentley

You guys, theyre not saying Russia rigged or changes the vote.

They are saying Russia helped because they leaked all that mess about Hillary... so in turn, people didnt vote for her because her truths were exposed.

Nothing is going to change.

We can read, but thank you.

[TheSoneNavy]

Originally posted by Mr. Grey

Lololol

No,

Russia and the US had always beens good friends, the left tries to smear Russia-American relationship because it benefits them, keep trying

This is why no one listens to you

[Yndda]

Originally posted by Lord Blackout

Because

that's still about a third of non-whites you're ignoring
not to mention that 'caucasian' stat is misleading. there's white hispanics and non-hispanic whites. 63.7% of the american population as of 2010 is non-hispanic white. 16.3% is hispanic or latino.
P.S. 'caucasian' is NOT synonymous with 'white'

[Khal]

Originally posted by TaggedGalaxy

I will love to see the Trumpanzees try to deny it now

They won't deny it. They'll just move the goalposts and say things like "well it's croooked Hillary's fault she was corrupt in the first place1!11!1!!1"

[Lord Blackout]

Originally posted by Bloo

Benghazi was basically a non-factor. Nothing came from it past the Senatorial hearings.

Benghazi was the most important factor this election but it remains ignored. It's what's sunk her numbers and made her "unlikable" and "untrustworthy" when she left her SoS job at a 69% approval rating and consistently had better ratings there than anyone in the white house. From there on, it became super easy for the Trump/Bernie character attacks to catch on. The 8 million $ tax money spent on those hearings was not money wasted.

[Redstreak]

Originally posted by Nikolai.

Why are people comparing this to Hillary as if Trump has anything to do with this
Crooked Hillary knowingly and willingly did what she did. And Trump will still be president y'all stay losing

And here we have it. Conservatives will literally sell their souls just to **** on "whiny libs." The irony of a party constantly claiming to be the only patriots now twice in our history being actual literal traitors to our country.

[Bloo]

Originally posted by Lord Blackout

Benghazi was the most important factor this election but it remains ignored. It's what's sunk her numbers and made her "unlikable" and "untrustworthy" when she left her SoS job at a 69% approval rating and consistently had better ratings there than anyone in the white house. From there on, it became super easy for the Trump/Bernie character attacks to catch on. The 8 million $ tax money spent on those hearings was not money wasted.

Republicans really laid off of Benghazi the moment polls showed that she went up in popularity after the hearing because the assault on her for it was absolutely ridiculous and the hearings exposed that. The only person that was really mentioning Benghazi at that point was the woman who claimed Hillary targeted her at the convention (whose speech-writer then later endorsed Hillary for president, lol). After the hearings, attacks on Hillary were focused on her "inherent" corruption as an establishment politician and the emails were the go-to attack by Republicans to talk about how she was incapable to serve as president. Anytime the top Republicans talked about Benghazi, it was to report that they found nothing in their investigation into the matter. It was a non-factor for most of the election. The people that were bothered by it were people that would have never voted for Hillary anyway.

[Istan4R]

Originally posted by Sunshine.

The same FBI who concluded TWICE that there was indeed nothing to look into? ff

Stop the false equivalencies. If you don't know what you're talking about ASK, don't just butt in like you have a clue.

The director stated she did send classified emails even Hillary admitted it lol. Maybe you should
Stop the false equivalencies. If you don't know what you're talking about ASK, don't just butt in like you have a clue.

[YoYo]

Originally posted by Haus

How can republicans respond to this? They stanned for the FBI when they were investigating Hillary and when they didn't agree with the CIA but now what

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/..._claim_it_was/

They do a good job at rebutting claims IMO.

[Witch Privilege]

I'm completely over politics now. Everyone can equally go **** themselves.

[Bloo]

Originally posted by Istan4R

The director stated she did send classified emails even Hillary admitted it lol. Maybe you should
Stop the false equivalencies. If you don't know what you're talking about ASK, don't just butt in like you have a clue.

The director stated that she sent emails with what they believed was classified material. What that means is that those materials were retroactively marked as classified by the FBI (meaning they weren't classified when they were sent).

A further break-down shows that Hillary only sent THREE emails containing information MARKED "classified" at the time it was sent. Two of said emails were incorrectly marked, the other was supposed to be marked "confidential" (which is a much lower rank of classification).

[Lord Blackout]

Originally posted by Bloo

Republicans really laid off of Benghazi the moment polls showed that she went up in popularity after the hearing because the assault on her for it was absolutely ridiculous and the hearings exposed that. The only person that was really mentioning Benghazi at that point was the woman who claimed Hillary targeted her at the convention (whose speech-writer then later endorsed Hillary for president, lol). After the hearings, attacks on Hillary were focused on her "inherent" corruption as an establishment politician and the emails were the go-to attack by Republicans to talk about how she was incapable to serve as president. Anytime the top Republicans talked about Benghazi, it was to report that they found nothing in their investigation into the matter. It was a non-factor for most of the election. The people that were bothered by it were people that would have never voted for Hillary anyway.

Not sure what you're talking about seeing as the Benghazi witch hunt killed her numbers before her presidential run and it only became inconsequential after her victory in the 2015 hearing. Even then, republicans still used it because it was still effective to a lesser extent.

And yes that mom is a political hack. Her son hadn't spoken to her for years before the attack.

[Adonis]

The only thing that would be messier at this point is if the electors voted for Hillary.

[heckinglovato]

Originally posted by Bloo

The director stated that she sent emails with what they believed was classified material. What that means is that those materials were retroactively marked as classified by the FBI (meaning they weren't classified when they were sent).

A further break-down shows that Hillary only sent THREE emails containing information MARKED "classified" at the time it was sent. Two of said emails were incorrectly marked, the other was supposed to be marked "confidential" (which is a much lower rank of classification).

[Ichinaru19]

Originally posted by Dracarys

Who cares.

It's too late.
Deal with it.

Are you kidding? Besides who won, this shows another country is trying to have a secretive influence in our democracy...

[Bloo]

Originally posted by Adonis

The only thing that would be messier at this point is if the electors voted for Hillary.

I would live for this, but I would also lock myself into my house to try to save safe...

[that G.U.Y.]

Originally posted by Lord Blackout

Those are ALL reasons. However, when you lose by 80,000 but win the pop vote by 2.8m, it's safe to say that the absence of any of those factors would have altered the outcome. This is why I don't get the "Sore losers. Keep blaming Russia" argument when it neglects the fact that Trump won MANY swing states by very slim margins.

And you refuse to accept she would have won those swing states if she had a message that resonated with those people.

A stalemate.

[Raster]

Originally posted by Adonis

The only thing that would be messier at this point is if the electors voted for Hillary.

hope this doesn't happen the Republicans have lots of guns and they'd be very trigger-happy