Quote:
Originally posted by MrDeeds
Post election riots: FAILED.
Jill Stein recount: FAILED.
Intimidation of EC members: FAILED.
"Fake news": FAILED.
"Russian hackers": ______
So pathetic.
|
What's the marker for "success" in any of these scenarios? I'm sorry, but this post itself is pathetic.
Riots weren't going to change the electoral process. They were to get messages and disapproval across.
The recount wasn't going to change the electoral process. It was mostly a way to uncover any deceptive practices...and honestly, the fact that it induced Trump to tweet out about the "3 million illegal immigrants who voted" I'd say was a success for the shot in credibility he took.
Yeah, never heard of the intimidation thing. More likely, they're intimidated what will happen if they vote AGAINST Trump. lol
Fake news is an ongoing discussion. There are no "sides" to the issue. The truth either gets reported or we muddy up our information streams with conspiracy theories and exaggerations from both sides of the political spectrum.
"Russian hackers" trails with the fake news thing. It's essentially an investigation into the source for some of these circulating conspiracies and points of misinformation. I don't think they're investigating if they hacked our voting machines. ddd
But you really thought you "got the liberals!" huh?