Quote:
Originally posted by BAYAR
The difference between Gaga and Lana is that Gaga tries to have fun and succeeds flawlessly.
Lana wants me to know she's not owkey, I'm maybe not owkey and the world definitely isn't owkey either. I listen to other genres when I want to hear that. Not when I'm in the mood for quick eargasm pop.
Gaga (08-11) is witty and pretentious in a good way because she used to make dance music. Her entire persona supported the electropop/edm stuff she was making at the time and the music complimented her too. It's a good balance. Lana is the complete opposite so it becomes unlistenable to me. Too many errors and contradictions stops me from enjoying her vocals, lyrics, etc. She's forced and it has become way too obvious now in 2016.
|
So is ok for gaga to be inauthentic because unlike lana she's "having fun"?

Because unlike Lana she makes happy dancepop songs?
How is lana the complete opposite? She's like a walking dead person and it perfectly matches her persona/music
If u're implying that she's faking being sad/depressed you are literally going too far because you dont know her personally, and she's been making this kind of music since like 2004. (Her Sirens album under the name May Jailer is even slower/more depressing than her LDR material)
Your arguments as to why Lana sucks are a joke. Just say that you dont like her shtick and aesthetic and be over with. No one can question that because it's your own personal taste.