Quote:
Originally posted by Trent W
The rest of the of your post is subjective BS that I will ignore, but can you elaborate how is Lemonade better business when it's selling a little above the double than ANTI and it costed 10x more to produce with all those videos and production costs?
On top of that Anti has 25million of profit above all the things I mentioned.
There's just no way Beyonce is making more than Rihanna with these couple albums, no matter how you twist it.
|
Oh Jesus Christ....
1. Google "profit". Try to understand what it means. After that google income too. And try to understand the connection and the difference between: profit, "pure profit" and income.
2. To my understanding, and anyone feel free to correct me, Samsung sponsored rihanna with 25 million dollars for buying anti but that amount includes also tour sponsorships etc.
LINK/ So: Anti as album did not generate income (let alone profit) of 25 million, only portion of that went to it. Also, 25 million cannot be classified as a "profit", let alone "pure profit" for rihanna or her company, label ec. (take a look at point #1 - you might understand what this means)
3. Dont forget that beyonce is on the second largest female tour of all time (could be #1 if she cares to add more dates, but hey, it is beyonce, why would she do that). She earns 5+ mil a night. So she can cover her expenses very well. I only use this point because you used samsung deal (in a wrong way) to cover "rihanna expenses".
Anyway, as always, it is pointless to argue with someone who is a troll and could not care about facts or logic.
P.S.-Do not forget to google #1 point
I wish Kworb could post WP-related results just for this week. 
