[geo]

There's talk that Boris wants to negotiate our exit before triggering Article 50. Good, we shouldn't relinquish our role in the EU as long as we're apart of it. Having a ticking timebomb would also weaken our position in leave negotiations.

[geo]

Originally posted by BlazingLovatic

Just as there's 'no evidence' for their being 'severe buyer's remorse', there's also no evidence against 'severe buyer's remorse'.

It's not as simple as "there's no evidence for X, so it MUST be false".

Other than a scientific opinion poll, there's no evidence indeed!

[Silence.]

The EU pushing the UK to leave and the UK ignoring it like the crazy ex that won't accept that it's over ..

A ****ing mess.

[z10]

Originally posted by Humunukuapua

The EU despises us now, I don't think they'll want us back even if we beg

well if it never gets triggered we never formally left or started leaving so theres nothing they could do about it

[z10]

Breaking911 ‏@Breaking911 26s26 seconds ago
Scottish independence poll:
Yes: 52% (+5)
No: 48% (-5)
(@britainelects)

All of this will factor in to whether it actually gets triggered lmao.

[Humunukuapua]

Originally posted by z10

well if it never gets triggered we never formally left or started leaving so theres nothing they could do about it

They need to just face reality and trigger it quickly then Did they not even think ahead to the possibility of us leaving?

[Silence.]

Originally posted by z10

well if it never gets triggered we never formally left or started leaving so theres nothing they could do about it

I'm sure there's something they can figure out to make things uncomfortable

[BlazingLovatic]

Originally posted by geo

Other than a scientific opinion poll, there's no evidence indeed!

Sorry, let me rephrase.
"No reliable evidence".

And before you refute that, you literally just admitted that they're prone to inaccuracies.

[Toxicity.]

Yeah the EU leaders have already said they want UK gone as quickly as possible.

[Dessy Fenix]

Who made this?

[geo]

Originally posted by BlazingLovatic

Sorry, let me rephrase.
"No reliable evidence".

And before you refute that, you literally just admitted that they're prone to inaccuracies.

They have a margin of error, that would be correct.

What do you want? A referendum on whether there should be a second referendum?

[z10]

Originally posted by Humunukuapua

They need to just face reality and trigger it quickly then Did they not even think ahead to the possibility of us leaving?

thats why david stepped down cause he won't trigger it lol and if the next conservative leader is a pro-remainer, or a brexit leader who is having 2nd thoughts themselves and doesn't want to trigger it, we won't leave after all.

[Kamren]

Originally posted by BlazingLovatic

ComRes, the company that predicted we would vote remain.

dddd

[geo]

Originally posted by z10

Breaking911 ‏@Breaking911 26s26 seconds ago
Scottish independence poll:
Yes: 52% (+5)
No: 48% (-5)
(@britainelects)

All of this will factor in to whether it actually gets triggered lmao.

Actually, that's a very good base for No to build from. Once it really hits home about having to join the Euro and Schengen and the Brexit saga calms down, I think No would win.

Nicola would be a fool to trigger a referendum right now.

[living_dead]

Ok, so let me ask again and hopefully someone will finally respond. Does anybody know when will the parliament decide whether the UK leaves or not?

[z10]

EU leaders can say what they want, theres nothing they can do to speed up the process of UK triggering article 50 because we haven't officially announced the will to leave.

LOVE that Miss Merkel wants the process to take time tho, I'm sure she knows the tea on how the longer article 50 isn't triggered the less likely it is that we won't leave

[monsterLd]

To be honest the vote was so close that it is OUR government that needs to take action on what, as a nation, is best. Half and half-ish are either in or out. If we stay in we need a better deal to help the ones who voted out and if we're out we also need a deal to please the ones who voted in

[BlazingLovatic]

Originally posted by geo

They have a margin of error, that would be correct.

What do you want? A referendum on whether there should be a second referendum?

Considering the scale of the margin of error and the very small gap between the 'Happy' and 'Unhappy' options, it's fair to say that it's not indicative of anything.

And asking whether someone is 'Happy' with the outcome is not the same as asking them how they would vote in a second referendum.

[geo]

Why are people acting like there's a chance Parliament will go against the democratic will of the people? I can't.

Only one MP so far has said they will ignore the vote.

[z10]

Originally posted by monsterLd

To be honest the vote was so close that it is OUR government that needs to take action on what, as a nation, is best. Half and half-ish are either in or out. If we stay in we need a better deal to help the ones who voted out and if we're out we also need a deal to please the ones who voted in

i agree with this. it was 50/50 so the gov should decide whats best for the country, either way 50% of people are going to be pissed