Nadal, Novak, Murray were Roger competition. Novak and Murray finally dominating at the age of 29 That's why even Nadal is superior to Novak, he had impact before Roger's decline
Not until later, Roger's main contemporaries were people like Roddick and del Potro. Nadal's rise was the end of Roger consistently winning everything under the sun, with that 10-20-something record.
I know, but Nadal wins are still more impressive because they came in a stronger era. And I don't even like Nadal, but when Murray is your main competition...
Not until later, Roger's main contemporaries were people like Roddick and del Potro. Nadal's rise was the end of Roger consistently winning everything under the sun, with that 10-20-something record.
Not until later, Roger's main contemporaries were people like Roddick and del Potro. Nadal's rise was the end of Roger consistently winning everything under the sun, with that 10-20-something record.
What ? Roger first slam came in 2004, Nadal in 2005. Del Potro first match with Roger was in 2007
The fact Federer won 12 grand slams out of 17 before Nadal's reign says a lot.
I don't think he could win that many if he was playing against mature and experienced Nadal, Novak and Murray.
The fact Federer won 12 grand slams out of 17 before Nadal's reign says a lot.
No it doesn't. If Federer had won more slams after Nadal's reign it wouldn't even be called Nadal's reign, it would be a continuation of Federer. Two players rarely reign at once.
Either way, Nadal already started winning slams in 2005. When Nadal won RG Federer only won 5 slams.
That's why even Nadal is superior to Novak, he had impact before Roger's decline
