Quote:
Originally posted by Marvin
Question: if an unlicensed teenager stole their parents' car and killed someone while driving, who should be held accountable?
|
Does a car have legitimate non-violent use? Yes. Is a car essential to perform daily, reasonable tasks? Basically yes, some people can live without cars, most can't.
Are those two things true with a semi-automatic rifle? We are arguing no. I don't know how such a large weapon that fires, what 11 bullets a second, can be justified for self defense. Unless you are in Syria or Iraq, it is not realistic that you are going to face an army of people coming at you that would justify 700 wounds a minute! There is a reason most cops do not even carry this weapon and soldiers do.
It's meant to kill people.
I know the manufacturer didn't break a law.
We are saying it should be illegal, so it doesn't happen in the future. Similar to how super pacs can accepts unlimited amounts of money from billionaires and millionaires. It is legal but shouldn't be.
:
(well we can both be wrong if she wins by single digits)
I'm sorry if this sounds rude, but if you won't bring any evidence and substantive information to this thread please refrain from quoting me.
His aides are resigning left and right and some are even facing criminal charges.