[eddytws]

Originally posted by Hunter_13

That's probably the solo version.

The remix sold a little more than it did.

yeah you're right thank god i was wrong

[WonderstruckFR]

It's the Hot Digital Tracks so yeah the remix (BB and WD) aren't counted.

But how OOTW only sold 349k ??? Thought it passed 600K some time ago?

[simmnfierzig]

Originally posted by WonderstruckFR

It's the Hot Digital Tracks so yeah the remix (BB and WD) aren't counted.

But how OOTW only sold 349k ??? Thought it passed 600K some time ago?

Complete my album hit it hard.

Billboard subtracts those sales, RIAA doesn't.

[WonderstruckFR]

Originally posted by simmnfierzig

Complete my album hit it hard.

Billboard subtracts those sales, RIAA doesn't.

Yeah thought about it later.

CMA really damaged her singles sales this era, but the most important is the album.

[Hunter_13]

SIO will pass 5M this year, so that's great.

[hindsight]

Howard Lau (Howardflyer)
Is it just me or did she improve a lot?

hollywoodshopaholic
She sounds INCREDIBLE, didn't know she could sing this well (or play guitar tbh)

sheeda s
I'm not really a fan of hers, but this 100x better than the album version.

Luke Johnson
Damn though. I don't like her songs, but I can't deny that she killed the **** out of this one. gg swifty

her talent >>>>

[Goaty]

The more I listen to these acoustic sets the more I realize that the production of 1989 really drags down some of the songs.

I wouldn't mind an acoustic release of 1989 sometime this year.

[WonderstruckFR]

UK Best Selling Albums of the Decade (2010-2015)
#88 Taylor Swift - RED 571,900
#33 Taylor Swift - 1989 956,700

[Icannot]

Do not come for Holiest Dreams' production.

[Finny]

sheeda s is stupid

[Goaty]

Originally posted by Icannot

Do not come for Holiest Dreams' production.

It's not that it's bad; it's just tiring. Which, for me, is characteristic of pop music in general.

That's why I can still listen to Red all the way through despite having heard it easily 10x more than 1989 while the latter hasn't seen a full play-through by me in months.

[Goaty]

I think it's very difficult to make timeless pop music. That's also why Shake It Off is such an important single of her discography: it never gets old.

[Vine101]

Shake It Off played at my Swim practice a couple of days ago (on the radio) and whew!

Such an anthem, how will she top it on T6??

[holocene]

Originally posted by Vine101

Shake It Off played at my Swim practice a couple of days ago (on the radio) and whew!

Such an anthem, how will she top it on T6??

According to her last interview, she'll do so by now focusing on quality!
(The way she basically admitted the greedy intentions behind $19.89 with that comment)

[Dani97]

Originally posted by holocene

According to her last interview, she'll do so by now focusing on quality!
(The way she basically admitted the greedy intentions behind $19.89 with that comment)

that bitch said the same thing for 1989

[Dollas n Diamonds]

As fun as it is to twist the lords words it's obvious she ment the only concept she has so far is quality. I.e you're not getting an album this year cause I got nothin

[holocene]

Originally posted by Dani97

that bitch said the same thing for 1989

If her lead single is produced by anyone other than Max Martin that means she was telling the truth this time though

[Safe&Sound]

Originally posted by Goaty

It's not that it's bad; it's just tiring. Which, for me, is characteristic of pop music in general.

That's why I can still listen to Red all the way through despite having heard it easily 10x more than 1989 while the latter hasn't seen a full play-through by me in months.

Not you dragging Wildest Dreams like that

The intro sounds of IAD, The Last Time, Everything Has Changed already make me tired
Red is great album, but the amount of fillers and boring songs is just too much

[mikeyace16]

Fearless and Speak Now >>>> Red and 1989

[mikeyace16]

Also, YBWM still hasn't gotten old. I find myself listening to it more than SIO tbh