[♚ PRiNCE HiGH ♚]

Originally posted by jose168

http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?t=79460
for more days as well, and we all know how this turned out



ahh guess its just gagas power i guess

Wait, Gaga ha powah indeed



I honestly cackle when people use this to drag gaga because she lost NOTHING by agreeing to this deal. She was paid the full price for each of the 400k+ albums Amazon bought.
If anything, Amazon is the losing side but I bet they made their coins too otherwise they wouldn't have agreed to be part of this deal

[Safe&Sound]

No.
and if u keep thinking it is, look what happened after that era
The karma strikes her back in Artpop era

[umich]

Originally posted by Safe&Sound

No.
and if u keep thinking it is, look what happened after that era
The karma strikes her back in Artpop era

No matter what may have happened with ARTPOP, the fact remains that she sold 1.1 million copies in the first week with BTW.

[♚ PRiNCE HiGH ♚]

Originally posted by Safe&Sound

No.
and if u keep thinking it is, look what happened after that era
The karma strikes her back in Artpop era

What kinda logic is this?

[Ezekiel]

You bitches get on my nerves. If your fave had an amazon deal you would praise them for being generous to people who can't afford a $14 album. Yes it counts and you girls can eat Gaga's booty

[SeanET]

Originally posted by Jewfro

No, she cheated. And karma bit her in her fat Italian ass.

Originally posted by hellocory

Yes but there's forever an asterisk attached to it

Originally posted by Flashing Lights

Yes, but that asterisk will always be attached to her name.

Originally posted by Ash12345

yes
with an *

Originally posted by Benjamin

Not really, there's a reason why Billboard immediately ran to change the rules to ban anyone trying it ever again.

Same reason they added "(From a non-re-released album)" to the end of Katy and Michaels 5 #1 record. It's not fair and shouldn't be counted.

Originally posted by Starstruck.

No, even Billboard always points out that she sold 440k copies for 99 cents.

Originally posted by Shamser

Lol at monsters pretending it was all Amazon choice.Her label let them do this.
Also i am pretty sure that it was their idea considering that album wasn't selling as good as Interscope want.
How do i know?Angela Cheng told me.

Originally posted by Patrick

No, which is why that sales figure is usually denoted with that pesky asterisk when it is reported.

Originally posted by LoKoPaNdA

99 cent discount* will always be referenced when Billboard writes about BTW's debut (they even changed the BB200 rules so that no one cheats again) but unfortunately, the future generations won't know that number wouldn't have been possible without the discount so slay Gaga!!! 1 million!!!

Originally posted by dirrtydiana

I don't count it.

this gif

Originally posted by Drowned_World

Y'all are STILL pressed about this four years later. I can't.

Originally posted by Bounce

Yes, they are! 4 years later and still fuming.

Originally posted by Chris▲

People sill fuming over this When actual people bought BTW, deal or not, it would've had a million debut anyways.

Originally posted by hausofandrew

1) Is it 2011?
2) You seem bothered.
3) Yes, it did.

Originally posted by Rusty

Deal with it, it's been nearly 4 years.

Originally posted by Bounce

Yes 1m+ debut BITCHES, 4 years later and still seathing!

Originally posted by Rama

It did.

It's been almost 4 years, don't y'all think it's time to stop fuming over it?

connect the dots

[TeemoR]

7 pages about this? The obsession of ATRL with Gaga

[Legacy]

Yes

[♚ PRiNCE HiGH ♚]

YIKES @ that post.


_

Still sold 1M+ copies and was paid the full price for it so the "drag" is kinda pointless

[Vertigo Stick]

Originally posted by Safe&Sound

No.
and if u keep thinking it is, look what happened after that era
The karma strikes her back in Artpop era

[Scandal & Media]

Yes.

[Eric.]

Yes.

[BadX]

Yes it does count

as long as an asterisk * is used

[Bounce]

Originally posted by Safe&Sound

No.
and if u keep thinking it is, look what happened after that era
The karma strikes her back in Artpop era

?

[TaylorFantasy]

Yes. One million is one million.

[Mariano]

Originally posted by Safe&Sound

No.
and if u keep thinking it is, look what happened after that era
The karma strikes her back in Artpop era

Everything that happened to ARTPOP was because of Gaga's hip surgery, Gaga getting addicted to weed after that, being depressed and having problems with her managers, which lead to them SPLITTING.

It's not really kind on your side to make fun of this and use "KARMA" for everything bad that happened to Gaga with ARTPOP, which was BECAUSE of her breaking her hip, cancelling shows, getting depressed and addicted to weed and being betrayed by her manager who was trying to make as much money as possible, in case Gaga couldn't perform anymore (when she was in the hospital)...

Nice person you are

[Bounce]

I don't get where is the "KARMA" exactly? What did Gaga actually do to deserve the "KARMA"? Is it because she salyed all of your favs from 2009 to 2012 NONE STOP? Or what?

[Darren-5-08]

Originally posted by Baby Boy

If it was full price, it wouldn't have sold over a million copies first week. That's a fact. But yes, it counts*.

The only FACT is that that ISN'T a fact. We cannot predict what would have happened without the deal. There is no FACTUAL evidence about what would have happened without the deal, so it is STATISTICALLY PROBABLE but not FACT. Idiot.

[BnPac]

Yes. What makes you think the people who bought the album at 0.99 wouldn't have bought it at full price anyway? Let's face it, some other girls had that kind of discount and didn't sell 400K with it. The excitement from her last era was so big at the time that I think she would have at least come close to it.

I don't see how that's karma or relevant to the era after. Gaga just annihilated her fan base herself by focusing on a small portion of it : the gays.

[Squall]

No, cheating doesn't count.