The real question here why is she being discredited like she doesn't have impact when she is worth 500 MILI and most of her coins are made overseas? So if she is so local why is she worth more than the "globals"?
BEYONCÉ is worth 500mili
Lady Gaga is worth 230mili
Taylor is worth 200mili
Britney Is worth 130 mili
Christina A. is worth 130 mili
Katy Perry is worth 130 mili
Rihanna is worth 120mili
Pink is worth 115 mili
Kesha is worth 40 mili
I like you, but this thread is wrong in sooo many ways/ First of all musicians rank isn't based on money, second it doesn't depend solely on their music. Dr. dre, anyone?
Looking at her receipts thread made by Haribo, she's a weak music-selling artist in most counties that aren't the US or UK. That's a fact and this thread is stupid when the majority of her worth is from business ventures and has nothing to do with how global she is lol.
The real question here why is she being discredited like she doesn't have impact when she is worth 500 MILI and most of her coins are made overseas? So if she is so local why is she worth more than the "globals"?
BEYONCÉ is worth 500mili
Lady Gaga is worth 230mili
Taylor is worth 200mili
Britney Is worth 130 mili
Christina A. is worth 130 mili
Katy Perry is worth 130 mili
Rihanna is worth 120mili
Pink is worth 115 mili
Kesha is worth 40 mili
Looking at her receipts thread made by Haribo, she's a weak music-selling artist in most counties that aren't the US or UK. That's a fact and this thread is stupid when the majority of her worth is from business ventures and has nothing to do with how global she is lol.
u nailed it! The amount of money popstar getting nowadays is not just about their musical success, mostly its all product endorsement deals and other stuff.
It doesnt have anything to do with it. For example Oprah is worth more and she is still local as ****. I wouldnt even known of her existence if she wasnt randomly mentioned in some sitcoms or threads here.
And Beyonce, even if she isnt truly local as Oprah, is not as huge outside of US as some Hive members seem to think.
Looking at her receipts thread made by Haribo, she's a weak music-selling artist in most counties that aren't the US or UK. That's a fact and this thread is stupid when the majority of her worth is from business ventures and has nothing to do with how global she is lol.
Beyoncé is also the best selling act of all the pop girls in Brazil South Africa
And she was huge in Japan lol
She is huge in the Netherlands
and no one outside of ATRL would class Beyoncé as local as she's obviously not, people just say it to rile the Hive up and you take the bait (hell, no one outside of ATRL even thinks about or considers the phrase global)
Majority of Beyonce's money doesn't even come from her music. Most artists these days don't make that much from music unless you're Adele. That's why they tour and do endorsements to compensate. That's where the money is these days.
I skipped the main part. The local vs global thing. How can you say she is global or not by the money income. Have you done an audit on her finances and resources share and income elasticity or what?
Russian oligarchs are super rich, and they are local as hell.
