Quote:
Originally posted by Pristine
It really isn't. Britney's achievement got nowhere near as much press then as 1989 is getting in this sales climate which speaks for itself - unless you think the industry professionals who are raving about this are less educated on the music industry than you are?  |
You are the one less educated. What does media coverage have to do with what Britney accomplished? Of course 1989 is getting a lot of press, as you said yourself in this sales climate - it's
something to talk about and very impressive.
I'm not going to get into which one is "more" impressive, because it's pointless. It'll be back and forth over nothing. Britney's phenomenon then is not something to argue about, because it's in the books despite what a hater has to say.
Either way, what they've both accomplished is more than many of you will outside of racing for high post counts and carpal tunnel.
You really think all this mania has been about her coming fourth? How dense can one be? Like a Google search or common sense as to why Britney is even in the discussion would've saved you from this embarrassing thesis. Hopefully you're like 11 years old, which in that case I'll give a pass. But brush up, babe.
