Quote:
Originally posted by TMTURKEY
Was Nicki's raw natural stripped down talent what got her to be successful? No. She had to manufacture herself to become what she is. Hint "Dear Old Nicki".
EVERY ARTIST that is successful is manufactured someway.
|
omg

I guess we'll go around in another circle then. I never said every artist wasn't manufactured in some way. Of course they are. It's all marketing and it's incredibly important. Nicki's raw, natural talent is what got her to be discovered though. Sure, it wasn't what got her to be a huge superstar in the eyes of the GP. But it got her discovered so that she could go through all that "marketing" and "manufacturing."
Whereas Iggy's ethnicity, attractiveness and marketability of being a tall, blonde, model from Australia in high fashion clothes who rapped was more instrumental in her getting discovered and signed than any raw rapping talents were. T.I. would have seen her and thought "damn, we can sell this" and not "damn, she's got good flow and an amazing voice." He was blown away by her looks and marketability and not any raw talent. Whereas with Lil Wayne, it would been both. He would've thought "damn...she's got a good flow, she can spit, she can write AND she's marketable" (aka she's attractive, she can sell sex, she can sell fashion, etc)
Are you ready? Because I'm going to say the thing about how if you strip Nicki down there's still raw talent underneath and how there isn't with Iggy, again.
Yes. EVERY ARTIST that is successful is manufactured in some way. I'm aware of that. But if you strip Nicki down of all those gimmicks, outfits, features, accents, wigs, branding, logos, features, etc. there's still raw rapping talent left behind, and with Iggy I don't think there is. I think the marketing and manufacturing is ENTIRELY what she's made up of. I think she's a girl who wants to be a rapper but she's not a rapper by nature, and practice isn't making perfect.