I just got six warning points! SIX! What is this? I had no idea the DWUW gifs are explicit, I cannot believe I went from nothing to 6 points! This is not right, I could've been notified to remove these. Oh my God!
Meanwhile these "hot daddy hunk I want his sperm inside of me" posts go around unwarned and unnoticed! Just because she's a woman I'm not allowed to say or post anything that's a bit sexual? What if it were a released music video? Would I be warned then? No, this is not fair at all.
Can the mods do something about the DWUW avatars the Monsters are wearing? Some with Brazzers logos, Gaga's butt crack, boobs, etc. Like you guys tell people to change their avatars over the smallest things yet you aren't doing anything about this clear violation of the explicit/vulgarity rule?
Can the mods do something about the DWUW avatars the Monsters are wearing? Some with Brazzers logos, Gaga's butt crack, boobs, etc. Like you guys tell people to change their avatars over the smallest things yet you aren't doing anything about this clear violation of the explicit/vulgarity rule?
Can the mods do something about the DWUW avatars the Monsters are wearing? Some with Brazzers logos, Gaga's butt crack, boobs, etc. Like you guys tell people to change their avatars over the smallest things yet you aren't doing anything about this clear violation of the explicit/vulgarity rule?
Can the mods do something about the DWUW avatars the Monsters are wearing? Some with Brazzers logos, Gaga's butt crack, boobs, etc. Like you guys tell people to change their avatars over the smallest things yet you aren't doing anything about this clear violation of the explicit/vulgarity rule?
If they can't use those DWUW avis then no member should be allowed to use a California Gurls avi (The one with a naked Katy Perry in a pink cloud making sexual faces.)
Can the mods do something about the DWUW avatars the Monsters are wearing? Some with Brazzers logos, Gaga's butt crack, boobs, etc. Like you guys tell people to change their avatars over the smallest things yet you aren't doing anything about this clear violation of the explicit/vulgarity rule?
