That's one thing I can say that they are not. They never had a sexual image.
That's a lie and they use to be one of my fav groups who made it cool to wear condoms on your face like a monocle so please miss me with they weren't sexual thing. We won't even go into what they were doing behind closed doors. I'm done with hypocrites. They are old now so what better way to get attention--shade the most popular female out right now.
1) T-Boz said nothing about Rihanna, just vaguely about pop girls in general (it can apply to most of them). Literally, neither "Rihanna" nor "Rih/Robyn/Fenty" or ANYTHING came out of her mouth
2) The broadcasters filled in Rihanna's name, likely because they figured if anyone would publicly clapback, it would be her.
3) Rihanna does in fact, clapback
Now, no matter whether they were talking about her or not, a feud exists, all created by this news channel flawlessly.
The show specifically said they singled out Rihanna. Unless a station could care less about being sued for slander, they would not have even put that in if it wasn't said off camera. They meant and said Rihanna. I just think T-Boz in mad and bitter, those THOTs down in the A are fierce with it.
The show specifically said they singled out Rihanna. Unless a station could care less about being sued for slander, they would not have even put that in if it wasn't said off camera. They meant and said Rihanna. I just think T-Boz in mad and bitter, those THOTs down in the A are fierce with it.
News stations have the right to take what someone said and shape it to fit whatever context they want...freedom of press
News stations have the right to take what someone said and shape it to fit whatever context they want...freedom of press
Baby, that' my major and NO they have no rights to edit news in that way it is still classified as slader and if a paper had wrote it libel, like that unless they want to be sued. THIS I KNOW.
