Quote:
Originally posted by Tennis Court
I'm not lying, the second and third doctors said so.
1. I didn't ignore it. Crutches/wheelchairs aren't for convenience. A person who is disabled needs a wheelchair for mobility to function as a human being. Same as crutches. A person would literally die if they couldn't move for months without those things if they lived alone, etc.
Also, that further proves why Lasik shouldn't be covered because they are not only medically necessary when other cheaper and better alternatives are available, they still wear off, defeating the purpose of getting it in the first place.
 |
Lying AGAIN. The second doctor did NOT say it was cosmetic. Her answer was "possibly", and then gave a few reasons why it may be considered so.
Edit: Another doctor on that same page said it was not cosmetic. What kind of **** source?
Of please. You can EASILY survive without crutches/wheel chair. People who are blind without glasses are JUST as stranded and incapable of functioning when they break them as someone who breaks a leg.
You are just pulling stuff out of your ass to save your horrible argument at this point.
