It matters early on in the album campaign. After that, it's pointless. Look at P!nk. Most of her US promo was concentrated within a span of 2 or 3 months before the new year started (fall of 2012) and then the album sold based off the singles. And it wasn't even a big promo campaign.
Britney's best bet is to just release a new single for this album. No performance will give it the boost to give the album some actual sales. I mean, for God's sake, have you seen the GRAMMYs boost? PITIFUL.
Not worth the trouble. The album won't sell. They can either discount it or re-release it to get it to reach Gold.
Finally, someone who knows what there talking about.
Finally, someone who knows what there talking about.
*They're
Quote:
Originally posted by Ozzy8923
It matters early on in the album campaign. After that, it's pointless. Look at P!nk. Most of her US promo was concentrated within a span of 2 or 3 months before the new year started (fall of 2012) and then the album sold based off the singles. And it wasn't even a big promo campaign.
Britney's best bet is to just release a new single for this album. No performance will give it the boost to give the album some actual sales. I mean, for God's sake, have you seen the GRAMMYs boost? PITIFUL.
Not worth the trouble. The album won't sell. They can either discount it or re-release it to get it to reach Gold.
This is not true. Performances have a humongous effect on catalogue sales (see: Beyoncé and P!nk) and current sales figures. The reason the Grammy boosts weren't that big was because everyone who performed had already done a promo blitz and nobody put on an insane performance. Considering how well the performers did, they all got very sizeable boosts.
It is true that a promo campaign does matter much earlier in a campaign, though. But to think promo doesn't matter is a kii. Just look at "Let Her Go's" slayage after the Super Bowl. I could name a billion projects that sold off of a huge promo campaign off the top of my head (see: "Applause" and 4) if you really want me to
This is not true. Performances have a humongous effect on catalogue sales (see: Beyoncé and P!nk) and current sales figures. The reason the Grammy boosts weren't that big was because everyone who performed had already done a promo blitz and nobody put on an insane performance. Considering how well the performers did, they all got very sizeable boosts.
It is true that a promo campaign does matter much earlier in a campaign, though. But to think promo doesn't matter is a kii. Just look at "Let Her Go's" slayage after the Super Bowl. I could name a billion projects that sold off of a huge promo campaign off the top of my head (see: "Applause" and 4) if you really want me to
Typo. Let's not play the grammar game. What you don't understand is that Britney probably won't ever promote again. I know that one promo performance won't kill her but its time to let go and move on.
just seeing her running up and down the stage with so many energy makes me smile.
Greece loves Britney