| |
Poll: Will Beyonce's "MCS" Tour Gross $300 Million?
|
View Poll Results: Will It Gross $300 Million
|
|
Yes
|
   
|
52 |
64.20% |
|
No
|
  
|
29 |
35.80% |
Member Since: 5/2/2012
Posts: 835
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTPOPULAR
omg that's not even the point. what's the point of having record breaking tours if you just extend the same tour for the rest of your career? 
 |
If that was the case then she would still be on the I...Am Tour. At a certain point demand dies down, then you start a new project. It may be hard to understand because this tour has high demand outside of Western Europe, but the demand has not died down... there are still many more places for her to go or go back to...
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/6/2012
Posts: 10,215
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTPOPULAR
omg that's not even the point. what's the point of having record breaking tours if you just extend the same tour for the rest of your career?
I want to read and hear all of this supportiveness when the artRave goes past the 1 year mark and Act 2 is released and toured under the same name. I better not see NO fuming.
|
There have been dozens of record-breaking tours that lasted 2 years and you guys had to fume in Beyoncé's one? 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 7,633
|
300mil is definitely possible if she has new music out. If not, probably 220-250m
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/29/2007
Posts: 6,545
|
Quote:
Originally posted by AnginaWilliams
That's exactly like saying singing hooks for Jay-Z and Kanye is a cheap way to raise your Grammy count.
|
DRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG HA!!
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/6/2012
Posts: 10,215
|
Quote:
Originally posted by AnginaWilliams
That's exactly like saying singing hooks for Jay-Z and Kanye is a cheap way to raise your Grammy count.
|
nnnn;;;
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/12/2012
Posts: 8,464
|
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/1/2013
Posts: 1,994
|
Quote:
Originally posted by RichGirlPlanet
The tour is just 2 years long.
The Monsters had no problem when Gaga did hundreds of dates, but now all of a sudden it's an issue.  |
you hoes.
that. is. not. the. damn. point.
"Hundreds" bitch she did 200+ shows gtfoh. And she was supporting a NEW album, for the 3rd time, that's new material, and she was still coming out with new music at the end of the last leg. There's no problem! It's just shady af to come out with a new album and not embark on a new tour for the purpose of adding to the gross of an existing tour. I mean, I don't know how many different ways it has to be said.
Y'all stay stuck in the delusion.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/25/2012
Posts: 30,317
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTPOPULAR
omg that's not even the point. what's the point of having record breaking tours if you just extend the same tour for the rest of your career?
I want to read and hear all of this supportiveness when the artRave goes past the 1 year mark and Act 2 is released and toured under the same name. I better not see NO fuming.
|
It hasn't even been a year yet and there is NO album in sight. 
You're upset about the whole record breaking thing aren't ya. Don't worry, Madonna's record is safe... for now. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/15/2012
Posts: 33,138
|
Having a lot of dates is perfectly fine. Cher, Gaga, and Celine all did it for their tours in order to get a high gross.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/2/2011
Posts: 9,796
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTPOPULAR
you hoes.
that. is. not. the. damn. point.
"Hundreds" bitch she did 200+ shows gtfoh. And she was supporting a NEW album, for the 3rd time, that's new material, and she was still coming out with new music at the end of the last leg. There's no problem! It's just shady af to come out with a new album and not embark on a new tour for the purpose of adding to the gross of an existing tour. I mean, I don't know how many different ways it has to be said.
Y'all stay stuck in the delusion.
|
Must be nice to know the date of the album, lucky you. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/24/2011
Posts: 29,233
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTPOPULAR
"Hundreds" bitch she did 200+ shows gtfoh. And she was supporting a NEW album, for the 3rd time, that's new material
|
Act 2 will probably support 4 AND the new album.
It's not like elements from Act 1 are going to disappear completely.
You just don't want her to have a higher gross-- had she been at $50m so far, this wouldn't even be an issue.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/27/2012
Posts: 18,963
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTPOPULAR
you hoes.
that. is. not. the. damn. point.
"Hundreds" bitch she did 200+ shows gtfoh. And she was supporting a NEW album, for the 3rd time, that's new material, and she was still coming out with new music at the end of the last leg. There's no problem! It's just shady af to come out with a new album and not embark on a new tour for the purpose of adding to the gross of an existing tour. I mean, I don't know how many different ways it has to be said.
Y'all stay stuck in the delusion. |
Firstly. 200+ = hundreds by definition.
Secondly, if Gaga was coming out with new material on the last leg, isn't that the same as Beyonce releasing new material?
Thirdly, we don't even know the new setlist. Calm down.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 6,144
|
nah, i predict 230,000,000 at the end of the tour.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/1/2013
Posts: 1,994
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Ressti
It hasn't even been a year yet and there is NO album in sight.
You're upset about the whole record breaking thing aren't ya. Don't worry, Madonna's record is safe... for now. |
LOL bitch?! Ain't nobody talking bout Madge. She can keep her record. Bey can tour as long as she wants to under whatever name she wants. I'm just saying, touring the same tour AFTER you release a new album IF a new album even exists is for shady grossing purposes.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/10/2012
Posts: 8,748
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bey0nce
I actually agree with you for a lot of cases, Pink does this a lot. But in Bey's case it's hardly the same, she's touring on no new material, when it was likely the album was pushed back but the tour couldn't be cancelled so she just rolled with it. Now it looks like the album is finally coming out and she's going to promote it. Why would she finish the tour and start a new one in a few months for the new album when there is still mass demand
And pls, she's on 123 dates. Not even close to Gaga's 201 or Pinks 185 |
She doesn't keep adding dates.  She announces 3-4 legs and that's it, nothing more.
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 3,839
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rafael
That's because you fave couldn't do it even if she kept her "Last Girl on Earth Tour 2010-2018"
|
I'm logging OFF 
GOODBYE
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/2/2011
Posts: 9,796
|
Quote:
Originally posted by alrightsir
She doesn't keep adding dates. She announces 3-4 legs and that's it, nothing more. |
Is P!nk done? I thought she would do another Europe leg. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/24/2011
Posts: 29,233
|
And not the girls acting like adding dates is some cheap tactic.
Touring is not a walk in the park-- it's strenuous, requires lots of dedication, and sometimes can even lead to injury (vocally or physically).
Y'all have SOME nerve.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/1/2013
Posts: 1,994
|
Quote:
Originally posted by swissman
Firstly. 200+ = hundreds by definition.
Secondly, if Gaga was coming out with new material on the last leg, isn't that the same as Beyonce releasing new material?
Thirdly, we don't even know the new setlist. Calm down.
|
No bitch! The OP suggests that this would happen after a new album is released, I'm not pulling this **** outta my ass, I'm just going with what the OP provides. Having two new songs that you perform at the VERY end of your tour is not the same as releasing a whole album and just rolling along on the same tour....y'all so damn thickheaded. A new setlist? So a whole new tour....under the same name....hm. Anyway, I'm happy for Bey. I can just see through ha ways. But congrats in advance if she snatches that 300mil.
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 3,839
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTPOPULAR
LOL bitch?! Ain't nobody talking bout Madge. She can keep her record. Bey can tour as long as she wants to under whatever name she wants. I'm just saying, touring the same tour AFTER you release a new album IF a new album even exists is for shady grossing purposes.
|
And if she doesn't release an album, what would you cling to then?!
The fact that she "should" have released an album?! To prevent from grossing more?! 
It's okay sis...
|
|
|
|
|
|
