Quote:
Originally posted by Marvin
Gimmie Dat is from her last album. I included singles that she was featured on during this era. I could include singles from her last album but I won't.  Kelly didn't perform her singles on TV but that was her choice. She chose to perform random songs instead of promoting her singles. You're acting like she didn't promote.
And I've never seen Kelly dance unless it was in a sexual way.  Kelly could've been just as big as Beyonce seeing as how they both in one of the biggest girl groups of all time but somewhere along the line she (or her label) dropped the ball. For her to go from easily selling over 100k each album with Destiny's Child to never doing it solo is shocking.
Ciara's always been bigger than Kelly tbh. Google doesn't lie.
I like Kelly but some of you are acting like she's this huge star while Ciara is just a local flop. That's just not true. |
I'm far from saying it! in my opinion they are at the same level, and it's a fact! the prove is when you say these things about kelly , we respong with (basically) the same things about ciara
we could continue hours because they basically have flops , some success , and talent!
Kelly anyway is a really good dancer you can see in her peformance with Dc , it's her choice doing that "sexual" dance (that i hate by the way) as solo...
this is more general, so not personally directed at the person, but why are a lot of people so obsessed with using Google (trends and stuff) as source to prove their point? That site basically only tracks how many someone is searched, which could be for multiply reasons and even google isn't that reliable since certain searches are also payed.
:jaming: