[I. AX]

Yes.

Rihanna is bigger than everything and everyone that alone puts her and Gaga above the others.

[superben]

No. Legend X and Britney had the bigger peaks, although Rihanna wins in the longevity and consistency department.

[swissman]

Definitely Britney and Christina were bigger at their peaks. They were a phenomena.

[AllEyesOnUz]

britney's prime (1998 - 2002) had BOMT,OIDA,IS4U
xtina's prime (03 - 06) had beautiful,candyman,hurt
VS
gaga's prime (08 - 10) had pokerface,bad romance,telephone
rihanna's prime (07 - 10) had umbrella,rude boy,only girl

so britney/xtina

[Shelter]

No.

[Liana]

no

[Last Boy on Earth]

Both are bigger and had way more impact than Legend X, not bigger than Britney tho, I can however see them having more consistency than she has when they reach her career age

[Toxicity.]

No. Britney alone was bigger than they ever were.

[OnlyManInTheWorld]

Britney at her best > Gaga > Rihanna >>>> XTina

[Monster Boy]

Britney at her peak > Gaga > Rihanna's consistent sucess > Legend X.

[RihannaLoverrr]

No. None of our fav's will eer be as 'big' as Britney was. She was literally everywhere. But since Rih is in the poll me being a stan voted yes.

[NewRihannaStan]

Britney trumps Gaga at her peak while Rihanna trupms Legend X at hers

[Fantasy]

Gaga's peak was bigger than Christina's, Rihanna's peak(s) was arguably bigger as well. Britney's first two eras completely blow them all out of the water though.

[D.M.F]

None of the 3 had a peak where they were bigger than Xtina. She had a 17 mill seller, that gave us 3 US #1 classics, won 1 of the 4 major Grammy Awards, and she became the #1 artists of the musical peak of the world in 2000.

Both Xtina, and Brit's 1st albums basically outsold Rih, and Stefani's whole careers so far.

Stefani brings that combo of Riri, and Stefani way down. C/X, and Britbrit are still more relevant right now then someone who hasn't been out that long -

Global iTunes Artist Ranking -

19 +2 Christina Aguilera
32 -1 Britney Spears
134 + Lady GaGa

X, and B win.

[hector.adriel]

The answer is no, but mostly due to the fact that Britney's peak alone > Gaga's and Rihanna's combined.

[Solarie]

LOL, no.

[Toxicity.]

Originally posted by D.M.F

None of the 3 had a peak where they were bigger than Xtina. She had a 17 mill seller, that gave us 3 US #1 classics, won 1 of the 4 major Grammy Awards, and she became the #1 artists of the musical peak of the world in 2000.

Both Xtina, and Brit's 1st albums basically outsold Rih, and Stefani's whole careers so far.

Stefani brings that combo of Riri, and Stefani way down. C/X, and Britbrit are still more relevant right now then someone who hasn't been out that long -

Global iTunes Artist Ranking -

19 +2 Christina Aguilera
32 -1 Britney Spears
134 + Lady GaGa

X, and B win.

Yes DMF

Educate them!
I'll ignore the first paragraph though

[Reza]

Originally posted by Harry

Britney > Gaga/Rih. Xtina wasn't needed tbh

Legend X was amazing when she debuted! Did you forget she won a Grammy for best new artist of the year.

If anyone wasn't needed It was Rihanna. Nobody used her until umbrella.

[QueenBeé]

They are bigger than Xtina, but not Britney.

[Frozen99]

Hell to the NO

The praise on Britney is so beautiful to read I'm so proud of her