[RastaMentality]

Invalidity

381 Not proven invalid.
No across the board. Not a single one proven invalid by Samsung.

[Red]

Originally posted by trackizmy1

Microsoft didnt actually infringe. They were creative enough to come up with a whole new interface. Stock Android doesnt infringe either.

I guess my worry is for innovation more than anything. I hope I'm wrong.

[RastaMentality]

Originally posted by Golden

I have no idea what all of this means.

[zombaland]

This is really getting sad now.

[NEUTRON]

Originally posted by Golden

I have no idea what all of this means.

It means that Samsung should have paid royalties for its line of hommage devices.

[RastaMentality]

SEC 15

Yes on Fascinate, i9000, Galaxy S 4G, Showcase, Mesmerize, Vibrant.
No for Captive, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, S2, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, Infuse 4G

STA: Yes for Fascinate, Galaxy S 4G, Showcase, Mesmerize, Vibrant. No for Captivate, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Galaxy Prevail S2 ATT, S2 Tmobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, and Infuse 4G.

[RastaMentality]

Originally posted by jayrNEUTRON

It means that Samsung should have paid royalties for its line of hommage devices.

Basically like how Microsoft got Google to pay them for each Android device?

[RastaMentality]

If you found the unregistered iPhone 3G trade dress protectable and famous, for each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC) and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has diluted the unregistered iPhone 3G trade dress?

For SEC: Yes to Fascinate, Galaxy S i9000, S 4G, Showcase, Mesmerize, Vibrant

[NEUTRON]

Originally posted by trackizmy1

Basically like how Microsoft got Google to pay them for each Android device?

!!!!

[a1016neo]

For those who are confused. The hell gates just open. :tank: Most of Samsung's older phones that infringes on Apples patents could be banned in the US. Apple will also use this verdict to go after HTC and Mororola, then possibly Google.

[RastaMentality]

Originally posted by Red

I guess my worry is for innovation more than anything. I hope I'm wrong.

I think new types of inovation will occur now. There hasnt REALLY been anything revolutionized in the mobile phone area. Only evolution. It's like everyone's riding with the wave and just responding to each other. I still think battery, shock proof, and water proof technologies all need to be innovated. People are just hopping on NFC + other basic things so it's kinda annoying to me tbh.

[Georges]

Will Samsung go bankrupt? What are the consequences here?

[Red]

Holy ****.

4:04:36 PM PDT

1 billion, 51 million 855 thousand dollars
4:04:03 PM PDT

Damages.

[h.u.r.r.i.c.a.n.e]

1 billion, 51 million 855 thousand dollars



WHAT?

[RastaMentality]

Apple gets $1.051 billion dollars in damages ($1,051,855,000).

[highwayuni]

This pleases me.

[Georges]

Originally posted by a1016neo

For those who are confused. The hell gates just open. :tank: Most of Samsung's older phones that infringes on Apples patents could be banned in the US. Apple will also use this verdict to go after HTC and Mororola, then possibly Google.

US only? It's not their main market too.

[Doc]

Oh my god.
Can Samsung appeal?

[Golden]

OMG @ Apple booking Samsung like that.
Give me those 855 thousand dollars and Apple can keep the rest.

[Georges]

DAMN
Apple ain't playin'.