| |
Discussion: Google replies to Apple v. Samsung case verdict
Member Since: 2/16/2012
Posts: 8,740
|
3:44:58 PM PDT
Claim 50 of '163 patent
3:44:47 PM PDT
Question 3
3:44:42 PM PDT
No on intercept and Replenish
3:44:36 PM PDT
for STA: Yes for Captiavte, Continuum, Droid Charge, Exhibit, Prevail, Galaxy S 4G, S II AT&T, SII T Mobile, Galaxy Tab, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Nexus S 4G, Tranform and Vibrant
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/16/2012
Posts: 8,740
|
3:46:14 PM PDT
For SEA: Galaxy Tab 10.1 Yes.
3:46:02 PM PDT
No for Captivate, COntinuum, Gem, Indulge, INtercept, Nexus S 4G, Transform, and Vibrant. Yes for Fascinate.
3:45:38 PM PDT
Yes for Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Exhibit 4G, Fascinate, Ace, Prevail, Galaxy X, Galaxy S 4g, S II AT&T, i9100, S II Tmobile, Galaxy Tab, Tab 10.1, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Replenish
3:45:02 PM PDT
SEC up first
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/16/2012
Posts: 8,740
|
3:47:22 PM PDT
'381: Yes for all devices.
3:47:15 PM PDT
Inducement for '381 '915 '163
3:46:59 PM PDT
Question 4
3:46:57 PM PDT
No for Captivate, Indulge, Intercept, Nexus S 4G, Transform and Vibrant
3:46:44 PM PDT
for STA: Yes for Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Fascinate, Prevail, S 4G, SII ATT, S 2 TMobile, Galaxy Tab, Mesmerize and Replanish
|
|
|
|
ATRL Administrator
Member Since: 6/29/2002
Posts: 77,601
|
This is horrible
Patents have way too much power.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/16/2012
Posts: 8,740
|
3:49:40 PM PDT
Infringement of D'677 patent. Yes for Fascinate, Galaxy S, S 4G, S 2 ATT, S2 i9100, S2 Tmobile, S 2 Epic 4G touch, Skyrocket, Showcase, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant. No for Ace.
3:49:06 PM PDT
'163: Yes for Droid Charge, Epic 4G, xhibit 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy Prevail, S 4G, S 2 ATT, S2 Tmobile, Tab, Tab 10.1, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Replenish. No for Captivate, Continuum, Gem, Indulge, Nexus S 4G, Transform, and Vibrant
3:48:36 PM PDT
No for Replenish
3:48:34 PM PDT
'915: Yes for Captivate, Continuum, Droid harge, Epic 4G, Exhibit, Fascinate, Prevaila, S 4G, S 2 ATT, S2 Tmobile, Galaxy Tab, Tab 10.1, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Intecept, Mesmerize, Nexus, Transform, and Vibrant
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/31/2010
Posts: 26,257
|
Holy ****  So they have to pay how much?
|
|
|
|
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 9/26/2001
Posts: 22,475
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Kworb
This is horrible
Patents have way too much power. |
I really fear for the future of mobile phones right now.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/16/2012
Posts: 8,740
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Kworb
This is horrible
Patents have way too much power. |
And Steve didnt lie when he said how much the iPhone was patented.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/2/2012
Posts: 22,450
|
Holy ****. Apple is sweeping.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/8/2012
Posts: 15,801
|
yes 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/16/2012
Posts: 8,740
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Red
I really fear for the future of mobile phones right now.
|
Microsoft didnt actually infringe. They were creative enough to come up with a whole new interface. Stock Android doesnt infringe either.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/17/2012
Posts: 10,399
|
HAHA. Apple wins. 
|
|
|
|
ATRL Administrator
Member Since: 6/29/2002
Posts: 77,601
|
http://mashable.com/2012/08/21/apple-samsung-copying/
Quote:
Even Orville Wright, before World War I, seemed to acknowledge that it would be a good thing if more people built airplanes, and eased up on other patent litigation even as his case against Glenn Curtiss dragged on. An airplane monopoly wasn’t in the world’s best interests.
Neither is a tablet or smartphone monopoly. While I don’t think that’s Apple’s goal, a victory for Cupertino could have a chilling effect on the rest of the mobile world. Companies won’t stop making tablets, of course, but the lines separating what’s copyable and what isn’t will get clearer. If rectangles are out of bounds… well, things could get ugly, quite literally.
|
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/16/2012
Posts: 8,740
|
The D'305 patent
Again, SEC up first.
For STA: Yes for Captivate, Continuum, Chrarge, Epic 4G, Fascinate, S 4G, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize and Vibrant.
Yes for Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy S i9000, S 4G, Showcase, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant.
D'889 Patent
No across the board
Question 9 — whether Samsung should have known? Big one here for damages.
D'677: Yes for Fascinate, S 4G, S2 ATT, S2 Tmobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, Showcase, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant
D'087: Yes for S 4G, Vibrant. No for S2 ATT, S2 Epic 4G Touch, S2 Skyrocket, Infuse 4G.
'889 No for both Galaxy Tab models.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/9/2009
Posts: 6,108
|
Samsung is guilty just as I expected. Now what remains to be seen is how much Samsung has to pay in damages to Apple and wheather there will be injunction on certain phones.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/4/2010
Posts: 37,894
|
I really dislike Apple's growing monopoly.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/10/2009
Posts: 10,622
|
Poor Samsung 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/16/2012
Posts: 8,740
|
Willfulness.
SEC: Yes for all but D'087 and D'889
SEA: Yes for 381, 915, 163
STA: Yes for all but D'087 and D'889
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/28/2010
Posts: 29,225
|
F*ck. So what will happen to Samsung? Will they be forced to
stop production of their devices? Will they have to give apple some of the profit from the devices? I'm so scared. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/15/2010
Posts: 26,154
|
I have no idea what all of this means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
