We actually mentioned adding 'scheming' to the warning system, but figured it wouldn't be needed enough to be formally added. Maybe we should reconsider?
We already warn people for sending in dumb reports, but maybe we should do it more often.
But what if the post is something that is subjectively considered warn worthy, and you decide to say it's unnecessary (or if the shade is too mild to warn)?
And if you made a rule about it, there goes 99% of your job as a moderator
And what will happen to the LOL-worthy report comments when the Report Teas are released?
It's not off-topic if it pertains to a misleading thread. Unless you really think a thread about an article about nails should have the title "Lady Gaga: Express Yourself"?
the sun reported it like half an hour ago and I thought it was new 
It was flaimebait.
