Yes, I'm aware of what the gibberish means in context with what the song is about.
Of course, I'm just curious when and where we draw the line. I could write a very compelling article about how Lovegame is actually about her clutch and love for the Fame. However, I don't think many would share a similar view, gaga included, because some things are just what they are on face value.
For example, I saw a lot of monsters, yourself included, shade the hell out of WFL for it's repetitiveness. However, the song in and of itself is the epitome of what Warhol's style was about. It was a seemingly generic song constantly repeating and emphasizing the same part over and over again throw in some subtle, mysterious lines and you can interpret multiple meanings from a seemingly generic song. Then Rihanna took the generic pop song and interpreted it to have a much deeper meaning in her music video for the song. She handled it very much in Warhol's style as well as stuff that Gaga does. However, I see most monsters just shade the song for it's genericness(maybe not anymore but back when it was popular) when the song in and of itself is the perfect example of what Gaga always talks about.
I'm glad someone else realizes why I love WFL so much.
And the lyrics are a little bit wack, I need to hear the song like nowE 
They did say our soon & not her soon though 