I wonder if John Lennon had lived, would he have been as desperate to stay relevant like Paul McCartney has been the last three decades? The music would have probably been better if he did.
I've never understood how they will always hide behind someone; Taylor, Adele, Beyoncé even Rihanna and Katy when it serves them. And its not just one or two but a lot of them with some few exceptions.
No one is undraggable. Every artist has an Achilles heel. With Beyonce, it's her solo worldwide record sales. They are pretty low compared to the other girls, especially with the magnitude of her star power and overall career length.
I've never understood how they will always hide behind someone; Taylor, Adele, Beyoncé even Rihanna and Katy when it serves them. And its not just one or two but a lot of them with some few exceptions.
So mentioning the fact that Beyoncé is undraggable is hiding behind her?
And let's not act like other stans don't do exactly what you're describing. The Navy is especially guilty of this. They frequently hide behind Britney when Beyoncé is mentioned, or Katy when Gaga is mentioned.
Its funny how monsters love to 'decide' when the BBH100 is right and when it's not.
In the early 2000s, when it's convenient to drag Britney, the hot 100 was totally legit! but now when it's inconvenient to drag Rih, it's totally fabricated!
So mentioning the fact that Beyoncé is undraggable is hiding behind her?
And let's not act like other stans don't do exactly what you're describing. The Navy is especially guilty of this. They frequently hide behind Britney when Beyoncé is mentioned, or Katy when Gaga is mentioned.
I've never seen the navy hide behind Britney. And yes you are right about stans of every artist doing it though, with the little monsters however, don't stop at one or two artists and hardly ever mention their fave in such context but would rather hide behind the skirts of other female singers.
Its funny how monsters love to 'decide' when the BBH100 is right and when it's not.
In the early 2000s, when it's convenient to drag Britney, the hot 100 was totally legit! but now when it's inconvenient to drag Rih, it's totally fabricated!
The Billboard charts have never really been perfect. In the 2000s, they favored radio over sales way too much, for example. But the way the charts are biased so heavily in favor of streaming and especially YouTube views is just embarrassing. And it doesn't have anything to do with Rihanna; she's just a prominent example of what's going wrong.
Let me rephrase my previous statement: ATRL fomos can try to drag Beyoncé, but nothing they can say will ever really matter because in the grand scheme of things, Beyoncé really and truly is the biggest and baddest bitch in the game.
Its funny how monsters love to 'decide' when the BBH100 is right and when it's not.
In the early 2000s, when it's convenient to drag Britney, the hot 100 was totally legit! but now when it's inconvenient to drag Rih, it's totally fabricated!
The thing is, Work is one of the 1st (if not the 1st) massive streaming hits that spent a lot of weeks at #1. In a few years people will look back and mention it as a start of the massive streaming #1 hits. People are not used to that right now, so that's why they are saying it didn't deserve to stay at #1 that long.
"A Thousand Years" is such a kiii. It never cracked the top 30 on Billboard yet it's bigger than many top ten hits, and even some #1s, released around the same time. Longevity > quick lil' singles
"A Thousand Years" is such a kiii. It never cracked the top 30 on Billboard yet it's bigger than many top ten hits, and even some #1s, released around the same time. Longevity > quick lil' singles
This reminds of Sail, it peaked at #17 yet it is certified x6 Platinium and sold around 5,5m.
Let me rephrase my previous statement: ATRL fomos can try to drag Beyoncé, but nothing they can say will ever really matter because in the grand scheme of things, Beyoncé really and truly is the biggest and baddest bitch in the game.
