[RCL]

Than Jessica , Mandy and Christina? What was In Britney That Made her STAND OUT? And Differ From the other lady's?

[FameFatale]

She could dance.

[BSNMology]

SHE HAS THE X FACTOR

[like2throw]

She was hot.

[Jeffsuxx]

more pretty , better body.. more cute , cute voice , sexy , catchy songs etc

[Scuba_Dive]

She came out first.

[Brando]

Originally posted by ItsKingsleyBitch

SHE HAD THE X FACTOR

basically

[EULONZO]

Her dancing, the fact that she went from innocent-sexy, and kissing Madonna. Probably more I'm forgetting.

Oh, and plus she was hot. And still is.

[MaRy]

she was the first, and she just has the x factor. Her perfomances when a kid where incredibly intense

[Brando]

Originally posted by Jeffsuxx

more pretty , better body.. more cute , cute voice , sexy , catchy songs etc

and this ofc.

+ her smile was unbeatable

[jordanjm]

Better songs, better personality, more beautiful, more drama, and persistence

[Jurred]

She was more genuine and likeable to the GP. Plus she came first that year, so all others that came after looked like copycats.

[Kavish]

Originally posted by ItsKingsleyBitch

SHE HAS THE X FACTOR

This.

[swissman]

Originally posted by Scuba_Dive

She came out first.

That's an interesting theory because their debut albums came out in the order of pop hierarchy as well:

Britney (January 1999) , Christina (August 1999), Jessica (November 1999), Mandy (December 1999)

What if Mandy came out first? Or what if this order was switched around at all? Would anything change?

[minxie]

Originally posted by Scuba_Dive

She came out first.

.

[like2throw]

Originally posted by swissman

That's an interesting theory because if I remember correctly their launches onto the scene match their ranking as well

Britney, Christina, Jessica, Mandy..

What if Mandy came out first? Or what if this order was switched around at all? Would anything change?

Britney would still be the best cause she was the hottest.

its weird because they gradually got less hot as the order progressed.

[olive]

Originally posted by Jurred

She was more genuine and likeable to the GP. Plus she came first that year, so all others that came after looked like copycats.

This!

[D.M.F]

X's more successful than Brit though (like now with Burlesque Soundtrack still charting unlike Femme Fatale, and Moves Like Jagger being bigger than anything Brit's ever released) clearly shown by people actually tuning into her show in droves.

Fyi ya'll X came out 1st, and actually does have the X factor.

[BSNMology]

Originally posted by swissman

That's an interesting theory because their debut albums came out in the order of pop hierarchy as well:

Britney (January 1999) , Christina (August 1999), Jessica (November 1999), Mandy (December 1999)

What if Mandy came out first? Or what if this order was switched around at all? Would anything change?

No.

Because (US wise anyway) Christina actually had a much better debut than Britney OVERALL. Sometimes & You Drive Me Crazy did nowhere near as good as BOMT whereas Christina saw 2 more #1s with What A Girl Wants and Come On Over.

Britney was just destined to slay over the course of time

[like2throw]

Originally posted by D.M.F

X's more succesful than Brit though, like now with Burlesque Soundtrack still charting unlike Femme Fatale, and Moves Like Jagger being bigger than anything Brit's ever released, clearly shown by people actually tuning into her show in droves.

Fyi ya'll X came out 1st, and actually does have the X factor.