be in a relationship with them?

Honestly for me it seems like a battle between morals and getting hit by reality. I would totally be there for my partner till the very end with unconditional love but at the same time i would have to care of him by giving them a bath, feeding, etcetcetc. Just plain out taking care of them 24/7. To me the cons outweigh the pros. So no i would not continue the relationship and wish the best of luck to them. I know it seems harsh but im not going to be a prisoner just because someone else expects me to look after them.

Sorry to tell ya Tweety, but that's selfish.

Slay me bajaboy07 with your thought provoking threads

It is definitely a difficult decision either way but if I loved someone enough, I would stay with them.

Yes if I loved them a lot.

Then your love isn't unconditional.

Yes and I'd wipe his ass if he couldn't do it himself. That's called love.

Seems like you just watched "Me before you", right?

Definitely. I've thought about this long and hard when I was in a relationship and I would stay. However i wouldn't feel an ounce of guilt for leaving if they started behaving like a jerk and it persisted for more than a year. Also I wouldn't go straight into a relationship with someone who's disabled.

Stuff like this is why I'd rather be single.

I'd be like:

Yes

Married? Yes. You took a vow and to some people that actually means something.

Somebody I'm dating? I would help to a point but I wouldn't and couldn't stay on hand as a caretaker.

I wouldn't become like a full time carer for somebody, no matter what. It would depend on too many factors to say whether or not I would stay in a relationship with that person though.

100%.

If I was in love with them, yes. If you wouldn't then you weren't in love with them in the first place.

yes, if i'm married to them I would

if we're just boyfriends and they push me away then that's on them

but my love doesn't depend on their body or status

100% yes.

Yes of course. I mean that is what love is.