a #1 single. Most artists can get Grammys and then be forgotten and flop into obscurity, but you're relevant as long as you're constantly getting the #1s
Critically, a grammy. Commercially, a #1 single. Over time, a #1 single. With the exception of ATRL stans and people in the industry, no one remembers who has won what grammys. Everyone remembers a successful single that dominated radio at a specific point in time though. It creates nostalgia and reminds people of that time.
Critically, a grammy. Commercially, a #1 single. Over time, a #1 single. With the exception of ATRL stans and people in the industry, no one remembers who has won what grammys. Everyone remembers a successful single that dominated radio at a specific point in time. It creates nostalgia and reminds people of that time.
Critically, a grammy. Commercially, a #1 single. Over time, a #1 single. With the exception of ATRL stans and people in the industry, no one remembers who has won what grammys. Everyone remembers a successful single that dominated radio at a specific point in time. It creates nostalgia and reminds people of that time.
you're kind of right expect the GP is usually unaware of what songs went number one or what songs won a grammy.
Grammys. Grammys typically indicate cultural impact as well as critical success (flawed, but it's how the Academy works), whereas #1 singles are only necessarily indicative of commercial success.
