Besides the busted weave, the-not-so-flattering outfit and the lazy choreo. Britney's eyes were on fire and it's still a very good performance despite being subpar for someone like Britney.
Do you think the media was just quick to point out things so they could put out a headline because it's Britney, bitch and her name and picture on tabloids sold millions because VMAs 2007 would've been a let down without the Britney incident?
People saying it isn't the worst, can you tell me what is?
Because Britney in 2007 had absolutely no redeeming qualities. She wasn't singing. She wasn't dancing. She looked a mess. Any one of us could have done a better job.
People saying it isn't the worst, can you tell me what is?
Because Britney in 2007 had absolutely no redeeming qualities. She wasn't singing. She wasn't dancing. She looked a mess. Any one of us could have done a better job.
