Originally posted by Nicole Of course it's commercial - it has a huge, anthemic and uplifting chorus. But there is another layer to that happy and uplifting chorus - a sad, wistful quality - that sets the song apart. It's something you don't find in an LMFAO song.

Originally posted by Jennifer I mean, you can analyze any song like that. You sound like a Britney stan trying to bring meaning to something that just doesn't have it.

Originally posted by Jennifer I mean, you can analyze any song like that. You sound like a Britney stan trying to bring meaning to something that just doesn't have it.

Some of y'all try WAY too hard for the "musical credibility" schtick.

Originally posted by Jennifer I mean, you can analyze any song like that. You sound like a Britney stan trying to bring meaning to something that just doesn't have it.

Except you couldn't argue that a LMFAO song has a more haunting/brooding/melancholy side to it, because it's clearly not there. It's a house rave-up.

WAY, on the other hand, has the opening tempo change, minor chords all over the place, a lot of self-doubting lyrics, particularly in the second verse, and a rather "sluggish" tempo for what's lyrically a "party" song.

Just because you're too busy trying to look smart to ACTUALLY analyze the song doesn't mean it's not there.

The song has quality and hard-work written all over it. Of course it's commercial. But to compare LMFAO's repetitive loop to WAY's complex structure is just plain ignorance. I make music and I know this. Even if you ask random people from the public, they would immediately notice the "Queen" vibe in the song. And we know how unique that band is.