In a new interview with Pitchfork () the mastermind behind Passion Pit had this to say:

Quote:

"I'm really obsessed with perfect songwriting craftsmanship. I don't think a lot of people in music today care about that. Maybe Dr. Luke does, because he has a formula-- but it's a terrible one, and it's not going to last."

Full article includes a lot about Passion Pit's new album that's due later this year:
http://www.pitchfork.com/news/45634-...ive-new-album/

PS when commenting, if you simply write "Who?" about PP you just come across as ignorant, not as offensive.
In Dr L's defense, his "formula" has been working for over a decade so it does seem to last..

That's not shading at all. It's more like full-force blasting.

This is not shade , Passion Pit is READING Luke DownE

Yesss! Drag him.

Passion reading Luke like a BOOK!!
Loves it

Yeah, okay. Passion Pit has how much success? Not to mention the fact that they spend their time remixing Luke's songs.

No lies told.

"I'm really obsessed with perfect songwriting craftsmanship."

Then why does your music suck so much?

They do this to correct the ****** production used the first time.

You should listen to the remix again.

They're right. :-/

Oh, you mean the Cali Gurls one? A personal fave of mine....

I was like who? So then I checked Wikipedia and all they do is remixes.

I'm a staunch defender of Dr. Luke, but I can't say the comment bothers me too much, because, well, I'm a bit of a PP fan, and Michael at least acknowledges that Luke cares about "perfect songwriting craftsmanship," even if he despises the formula Luke uses to achieve pop perfection. Hardly seems like a blast, really.

they both suck

Well, all of Dr. Luke's songs do sound a lot alike.

My thoughts exactly