Erm, there's no law against viewing **** so they would have no legal precedent to turn your info to authorities. "Child ****ography" searches, however, are a different story.
Erm, there's no law against viewing **** so they would have no legal precedent to turn your info to authorities. "Child ****ography" searches, however, are a different story.
I don't think this is true.
Maybe it is Child ****ography searches and not just **** and even so they still shouldn't be able to send in your search information because of that. Sometimes people are looking up for relevant information ABOUT child ****ography.
How is someone who watches **** a sex offender? Does not compute.
Exactly. Everyone gets off to ****, even the idiots who are behind this ridiculous operation they're trying to force upon the general public. I could see if one was looking up child **** but if not
Erm, there's no law against viewing **** so they would have no legal precedent to turn your info to authorities. "Child ****ography" searches, however, are a different story.
Do you have a source? I'm not quite sure I believe this, and it wasn't mentioned in the Fox clip you showed (putting aside the fact that Fox isn't very trustworthy to begin with).
and I already use firefox so... 
