|
Celeb News: The New Yorker: M.I.A. shouldn't have apologized.
Member Since: 5/17/2010
Posts: 21,708
|
The New Yorker: M.I.A. shouldn't have apologized.
Quote:
The most important artist of the aughts played the Super Bowl last night. Maybe you saw it. In the middle of Madonna’s set, Maya Arulpragasam—professionally known as M.I.A.—performed her part in the new Madonna song, “Give Me All You Luvin’.” In the original video, she ends her kind of meh verse by saying “I’ma say this once—yeah, I don’t give a ****.” Also in the video, she makes the “finger gun” hand signal, synced to a gunshot that references her biggest hit, “Paper Planes.” Last night, she flipped America the bird, rather than a gun. Cue apologies and hand wringing.
As reported by Todd Martens and Patrick Kevin Day on the Los Angeles Times Web site, the NFL, NBC, and M.I.A. have all apologized. Tim Winter of the Parents Television Council, whose job is to get mad, got mad about this “offensive material.” So we have two subjects: the incident and the artist.
The outrage is tiresome and deeply hypocritical, in all the tiresome ways you’ve been tired out by before. M.I.A. was illustrating her line, acting out the attitude of the words: performing. Fine, it may not be legal to flip the bird on television, but that’s simply a remnant of the fifties we haven’t shaken. Unless somebody was handing out Xanax with the foam fingers, Lucas Oil Stadium was ringing with the music of profanities last night. More to the point, television viewers were submitted to ad after ad that likened women—negatively—to sofas, cars, and candy. Mr. Winter didn’t have anything to say about that, so I’d like to raise both of my middle fingers to him and anyone who thinks profanity is somehow more harmful to our children than images of violence and misogyny. (My two sons, fourteen and eleven, thought the Fiat ad was corny, so I guess they will be safe without Mr. Winter’s intervention.) I say we get out of The Pretending To Be Moral game altogether and use the Internet for important things like posting pictures of cats looking at croissants and PDFs of sensitive government documents.
The artist, of course, is M.I.A. About seven years ago, I praised her for several things, including turning the noxious generalization of “world music” into an idea that represents life as it is lived, and affords huge aesthetic possibilities. She made two albums that received all the praise they deserved, and then a third album called “/\/\/\Y/\,” which received a deeply weird and negative review in Pitchfork (unless you think M.I.A. is here only to provide “bangers” and hasn’t already vaulted way past her “potential as a pop artist” many times) and, most damagingly, the worst profile ever written about a musician, in the New York Times Magazine. (The trend of letting people who know nothing about music profile musicians is as outdated as fretting about cursing. Quite rightly, nobody would ever let me profile an Al Qaeda member; somehow, though, pop music is such a culturally light topic that no background is needed to cover it.)
Maya provokes, over and over, and if some of the provocations don’t entirely work, that hardly invalidates the ones that do. Her new single, “Bad Girls,” isn’t up to much, but director Roman Gavras makes it an uncanny combination of club swagger and rebel time-wasting in this video, a bit like a Syrian version of “Two-Lane Blacktop.” On the other side of the scale, Gavras and M.I.A. teamed up for the “Born Free” video, which was banned by YouTube (your go-to source for family-friendly material). Unless you’re living somewhere very unusual, the sight of white people being rounded up and shot is genuinely unsettling and not trivial, not when the U.S. is expanding its ability to detain people indefinitely and innocent people have been detained and tortured at Guantánamo Bay. Remind me why we’re talking about a middle finger again? I’m just sorry Maya apologized.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/2/2010
Posts: 8,726
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/23/2011
Posts: 2,074
|
Wait when did she apologize
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/2/2011
Posts: 2,432
|
It's not that big of a deal but she shouldn't have done it. Not 'cause it offended people but because it's all people are talking about. It was Madonna's time to shine and it was disrespectful.
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/17/2010
Posts: 21,811
|
This article is SO DAMN TRUE. These commercials are WAY worse than what M.I.A "did".
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/16/2010
Posts: 15,137
|
Quote:
I’d like to raise both of my middle fingers to him and anyone who thinks profanity is somehow more harmful to our children than images of violence and misogyny.
|
Where's the lie?
What she did was completely tryhard, unappealing, and unnecessary. But the article is correct. I'm not here for all this false morality and hand-wringing while those ridiculous Go Daddy ads and all the other commercials with damn near naked women are considered acceptable.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/4/2011
Posts: 4,038
|
I couldn't agree more with the commercial part. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/3/2011
Posts: 11,947
|
When did she apologize? What did she say?
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 10/13/2008
Posts: 20,553
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/28/2011
Posts: 10,662
|
Oh ****! Totally agree. Though I thought M.I.A. DIDN'T apologize - only NBC and the NFL did?
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/23/2011
Posts: 11,596
|
Read this article earlier, and totally agree.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 6/25/2011
Posts: 37,192
|
M.I.A. DIDN'T apologize tho...
But they were spot on with their points. The misogyny of those ads was HORRIFYING.
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 10/3/2010
Posts: 12,334
|
The New Yorker missed the entire point that Maya was trying to make though.
She flipped everyone off because she was told that she had to censor her verse, but in a way that would still allow people to understand that she means "****" instead of "shi" at the end of her song
So she flipped everyone off to make the point that partially censoring something is no better than not censoring it at all.
The New Yorker is so ****ing pretentious though
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/21/2010
Posts: 2,175
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Anthagio
It's not that big of a deal but she shouldn't have done it. Not 'cause it offended people but because it's all people are talking about. It was Madonna's time to shine and it was disrespectful.
|
I'm not seeing how this was disrespectful to Madge. Madonna chose M.I.A. to be a part of the song and performance, anything that happens after that decision is fair game.
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/15/2009
Posts: 2,121
|
True article, but it means to dismiss MIA's actions, which are still heinous. The middle finger is an obscene gesture and not appropriate for TV. Sure the ads were misogynistic, but the middle finger is STILL bad.
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/1/2010
Posts: 23,572
|
Americans are so uptight 
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/26/2010
Posts: 28,299
|
Wait she apologized? Disappointed on her.
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/11/2010
Posts: 28,420
|
I completely agree with everything they said. To be offended by a middle finger in the year 2012 when nearly naked women are being exploited on television via commercials and reality shows is hypocritical. Worse things have been aired during the Superbowl, past and present. Besides, nobody would have even noticed it, had the press not made it into such a big deal.
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/23/2011
Posts: 16,377
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/20/2010
Posts: 7,042
|
If Janet had to apologize she should have too!
|
|
|
|
|