Natalie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mila

They both suck for being unoriginal and uninteresting tbh. You could tell the whole story before even watching them, I've only seen the trailers for both films and yet I feel like I've seen them both in full.

But producing companies don't approve

35 million budget vs. 25 million budget

No Strings Attached was more profitable

OH, and The Numbers' statistic shows that

Friends with Benefits：
Theatrical Performance
Domestic Gross $55,802,754
International Gross $94,008,683
Worldwide Gross $149,811,437


No Strings Attached
Theatrical Performance
Total US Gross $70,662,220
International Gross $78,565,858
Worldwide Gross $149,228,078

Oops, not that far

Anyway, I don't like both.

Natalie Portman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

i don't like that kind of movies but i love Natalie Portman.. and Justin in a movie is the worst thing ever

No Strings Attached was released in a less active time of the year with regard to attendance. Considering it had a fraction of the hype and a smaller budget, I think it's the real winner.

I saw fwb in theaters, it was a really good movie with such a cute ending

NSA has Natalie. So all opinions calling FWB superior are invalidated.

this is true.
It's no cinematic masterpiece by any means. It's predictable and cliche'd. But it's watchable, time killing, entertaining and cute. :P
I enjoyed it. But it's pretty forgettable.

i'm here for King JT

!!! i saw both in opening week though

Friends with Benifits all the way!!!!!
Even though I live Natalie!

Friends with benefits was soooo much better. It kept it classy as possible while NSA got kinda gross at times