There seems to be a lot of people who think her comment had absolutely nothing to do with Bionic performing so badly.

So I ask you this question:
Did shading Gaga contribute to the poor performance of Bionic? In any way shape or form? Even in the slightest bit?

My logic is that a lot of people lost respect for her and decided not to buy Bionic as a result. Am I wrong here?

If the general consensus is "No" then I'll gladly eat my words.

No trolling or flamebait, please. I'm merely going to watch the discussion pan out.

GO!

Yes

Not really that much...

I mean, the lead single of the otherwise solid album was not followed up appropriately.

Welp, Yes
With the help of our good sis Perez Hilton

Not really..

obviously not. bionic was a mess. it has nothing to do with gaga... at all.

It probably affected a very few amount of people.

No.

Not really that much = yes

No, but why bring more attention to an issue better left undicussed.

AP 500 times..
And why not include the quotes?

Duh. Gaga's fanbase came from Christina/Britney's old ones.

No. Outside of ATRL not many people know about her comments.

Currently browsing: 27 members (‎mariska, ‎Accra, ‎SiXo, ‎Glamazon, ‎warrenc, ‎jomarr, ‎kgeezy310, ‎jeeriz, ‎HotNCold, ‎lestat111, ‎aloirt, ‎Haus_of_Will, ‎Wepamiso, ‎bolbi, ‎SwagLikeALegend, ‎Remixed, ‎dallaskingman), 15 guests.

What did xtina say?

You seriously try the most.

If you think "Monsters" drive the music industry, you're crazy. Bionic bombed because NMT was crap and her label decided not to promote it after NMT flopped.

No, that was her own fault.

Well, it just added to her widely plublicized 'bitchy' image, which I guess was finally too off-putting to the general public that time around. However, there were many more reasons as to why Bionic flopped.