Quote:
Originally posted by itsJAMESbitch
i don't agree. i think that's a very ridiculous way to look at a movie. i can understand if the ending completely changed everything that we see but just not liking an ending? it's ridic imo to say that a movie was **** because of that.
|
As Roger Ebert (renowned critics) once said to a bad ending movie :"It's the worst kind of bad film: the kind that gets you all worked up and then lets you down, instead of just being lousy from the first shot."
Ending should be a conclusion to a movie. With bigger the expectation comes with bigger disappointment. If a movie can't deliver what it seems to promise, for viewers, the whole communication is incomplete. Most of the viewers still see a movie as one entity. They won't do a breakdown analysis to every part of it. Ending is like a concealer, if a movie can't be concealed. The viewer will think they got choppy pieces, and they can't congeal them together.
